Welcome to the MedLibrary.org Wikipedia Supplement on Battle of Bunker Hill -- Please Click to Return to Front Page

Battle of Bunker Hill Part of the American Revolutionary War The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker Hill by John Trumbull Date June 17, 1775 Location 42°22′34.9″N 71°3′38.8″W / 42.376361, -71.060778Coordinates: 42°22′34.9″N 71°3′38.8″W / 42.376361, -71.060778 Charlestown, Massachusetts Result Pyrrhic British victory; Colonial moral victory Territorial changes British capture Charlestown peninsula Belligerents Kingdom of Great Britain United Colonies Commanders British Army: William Howe Sir Robert Pigot John Pitcairn † Henry Clinton Royal Navy: Samuel Graves Israel Putnam William Prescott Joseph Warren † Seth Pomeroy John Stark (Warren and Pomeroy declined command and fought as individuals) Strength 3,000+1 about 2,4002 Casualties and losses 226 killed, (including 19 officers) 828 soldiers wounded, (including 62 officers) Total: 1,0543 115 killed, 305 wounded, 30 captured (20 POWs Died) Total: 4504

v • d • e Boston campaign, 1774–76 Powder Alarm – Lexington and Concord – Siege of Boston – Chelsea Creek – Bunker Hill – Gloucester – Dorchester Heights

The Battle of Bunker Hill took place on June 17, 1775 on Breed's Hill, as part of the Siege of Boston during the American Revolutionary War. General Israel Putnam was in charge of the revolutionary forces, while Major-General William Howe commanded the British forces. Because most of the fighting did not occur on Bunker Hill itself, the conflict is sometimes more accurately (though less often) called the Battle of Breed's Hill.

On the night of June 16, in response to intelligence that the British were soon to attempt the capture of undefended high ground around Boston, Colonial forces stealthily occupied Bunker Hill and Breed's Hill, constructed an earthen redoubt on Breed's Hill, and built lightly fortified lines across most of the Charlestown Peninsula. In response, the British mounted an attack on those positions the following day. After two assaults on the Colonial lines were repulsed with significant British casualties, the British finally captured the positions on the third assault, after the defenders in the redoubt ran out of ammunition. The Colonial forces retreated over Bunker Hill to Cambridge, suffering their greatest losses on Bunker Hill.

While the result was a victory for the British, they suffered their greatest losses of the entire war: over 800 wounded and 226 killed, including a notably large number of officers. Their immediate objective (the capture of Bunker Hill) was achieved, but did not significantly alter the state of siege. It did, however, demonstrate that relatively inexperienced Colonial forces were willing and able to stand up to experienced troops in a pitched battle.

Contents 1 Geography and strategy 2 Prelude to battle 2.1 Fortification of Breed's Hill 2.2 British preparations 2.3 Colonists reinforce their positions 3 Assault 4 Aftermath 5 Analysis 5.1 Colonial faults 5.2 British faults 6 "The whites of their eyes" 7 Colonial Volunteers 8 Commemorations 9 See also 10 Notes 11 References and further reading 12 External links 12.1 Pages about the battle 12.2 Pages about people in the battle 12.3 Other external pages

Geography and strategy

Boston, being on a peninsula,⁵ was largely protected from close approach by the expanses of water surrounding it, which were dominated by British warships. In the aftermath of the battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775, the Colonial militia, a force of about 15,000 men⁶ had surrounded the town, and effectively besieged it. Under the command of Artemas Ward, they controlled the only land access to Boston itself (the Roxbury Neck), but, lacking a navy, were unable to control or even contest British domination of the waters of the harbor. The British troops, a force of about 6,000 under the command of General Thomas Gage, occupied the city, and were able to be resupplied and reinforced by sea.⁷

The Charlestown Peninsula, lying to the north of Boston, started from a short, narrow isthmus (known as the Charlestown Neck) at its northwest, extending about 1 mile (1.6 km) southeastward into Boston Harbor. Bunker Hill, with an elevation of 110 feet (34 m), lay at the northern end of the peninsula. Breed's Hill, at a height of 62 feet (19 m), was more southerly and nearer to Boston.⁸ The town of Charlestown occupied flats at the southern end of the peninsula. At its closest approach, less than 1,000 feet (305 m) separated the Charlestown Peninsula from the Boston Peninsula, where Copp's Hill was at about the same height as Breed's Hill. While the British retreat from Concord had ended in Charlestown, General Gage, rather than immediately fortifying the hills on the peninsula, had withdrawn those troops to Boston the day after that battle, turning the entire Charlestown Peninsula into a No man's land.⁹

Throughout May the British received reinforcements, until they reached a strength of about 6,000 men. On May 25, three Generals arrived on HMS Cerberus: William Howe, John Burgoyne, and Henry Clinton. Gage began planning with them to break out of the city,¹⁰ finalizing a plan on June 12. Word of these plans leaked to the militia command on the 13th, who on the 15th decided that additional defenses needed to be erected.¹¹ General Ward directed General Israel Putnam to set up defenses on the Charlestown Peninsula, specifically on Bunker Hill.¹²

Prelude to battle

Fortification of Breed's Hill

On the night of June 16, 1775, Colonial Colonel William Prescott led 1,200 men onto the peninsula in order to set up positions from which artillery fire could be directed into Boston.¹³ At first, Putnam, Prescott, and their engineer, Captain Richard Gridley, disagreed as to where they should locate their defense. Some work was performed on Bunker Hill, but Breed's Hill was closer to Boston and viewed as being more defensible. Arguably against orders, they decided to build their primary redoubt there.¹⁴ Prescott and his men, using Gridley's outline, began digging a fortification about 130 feet (40 m) square with ditches and earthen walls. They added ditch and dike extensions toward the Charles River on their right and began reinforcing a fence running to their left. The walls of the redoubt were about 6 feet (2 m) high, with a wooden platform inside on which men could stand and fire over the walls.¹⁵

In the early predawn, around 4:00 a.m., a sentry on board HMS Lively spotted the new fortification. Lively opened fire, only temporarily halting the Colonists' work. Aboard his flagship HMS Somerset, Admiral Samuel Graves awoke irritated by the gunfire that he had not ordered.¹⁶ He stopped it, only to have General Gage countermand his decision when he was made aware of the situation. He ordered all 128 guns in the harbor, as well as batteries atop Copp's Hill in Boston, to fire on the Colonists' position, which had relatively little effect.¹⁷

British preparations

When General Gage surveyed the works from Boston with his staff, Loyalist Abijah Willard recognized his brother-in-law Colonel Prescott. "Will he fight?" asked Gage. "[A]s to his men, I cannot answer for them;" replied Willard, "but Colonel Prescott will fight you to the gates of hell."¹⁸ Prescott lived up to Willard's word, but his men were not so resolute. When the Colonists suffered their first casualty, Asa Pollard of Billerica,¹⁹ a young private killed by cannon fire, Prescott gave orders to bury the man quickly and quietly, but a large group of men gave him a solemn funeral instead, with several deserting shortly thereafter.¹⁸

It took almost six hours for the British to organize an infantry force and to gather up and inspect the men on parade. General Howe was to lead the major assault, drive around the Colonist's left flank, and take them from the rear. Brigadier General Robert Pigot on the British left flank would lead the direct assault on the redoubt. Major John Pitcairn led the flank or reserve force. It took several trips in longboats to transport Howe's forces to the eastern corner of the peninsula, known as Moulton's Hill. By 2 p.m., the British were ready to act.²⁰

Colonists reinforce their positions

The Colonists, seeing this activity, had also called for reinforcements. Among the reinforcements were Joseph Warren and Seth Pomeroy, who both chose to serve as infantry.²⁰ Prescott ordered the Connecticut men under Captain Knowlton to defend the left flank, where they used a crude stone wall as a breastwork, and topped it with fence rails and hay. Troops that arrived to reinforce this flank position included the 1st and 3rd New Hampshire regiments of 200 men, under Colonels John Stark and James Reed. Stark's men took positions along the breastwork to the north end of the Colonists' position. When low tide opened a gap along the Mystic River to the north, they quickly extended the fence with a short stone wall to the water's edge.²¹ Colonel Stark placed a stake about 100 feet (30 m) in front of the fence and ordered that no one fire until the regulars passed it.²² Just prior to the action, further reinforcements arrived, including portions of Massachusetts regiments of Colonels Brewer, Nixon, Woodbridge, Little, and Major Moore, and Callender's company of artillery.²³

Assault

Brigadier General Pigot, commanding the 5th, 38th, 43rd, 47th, and 52nd infantries, as well as Major Pitcairn's Marines, assaulted the redoubt. Prescott, in defense, instructed his men to wait until his signal to fire on the attackers. When they did so, it was with devastating effect, and the regulars were forced to retreat.²⁴

General Howe led the light infantry companies and grenadiers in the assault on the American left flank. His light infantry were set along the narrow beach, on the far right flank of the Colonial position, with the grenadiers in the middle. They lined up four deep and several hundred across, led by officers in scarlet red jackets. As the regulars closed, John Simpson, a New Hampshire man, prematurely fired, drawing a useless volley of return fire from the regulars. When they regulars finally closed within range, both sides opened fire. The colonists inflicted heavy casualties on the regulars, especially targeting the red-clad officers, using the fence to steady and aim their muskets. The regulars retreated in disarray, and the militia held their ground.²⁵

The British reserves, gathering just north of Charlestown village, were taking casualties from sniper fire, and set fire to the town. The smoke billowing from Charlestown lent an almost surreal backdrop to the fighting, as the winds were such that the smoke was kept from the field of battle.²⁶ The regulars reformed on the field and made a second unsuccessful attack against the redoubt and the northern flank, that again resulted in significant British casualties.²² Meanwhile, in the rear of the colonial forces, confusion reigned. General Putnam tried, with only limited success, to send additional troops from Bunker Hill to Breed's Hill to support the men in the redoubt.²⁷

Finally, General Howe ordered a third attack, in which the reserves were also deployed, along with General Clinton and 400 volunteer marines that crossed from Boston after seeing the failed assaults.²⁸ This assault, concentrated on the redoubt (with only a feint on the Colonial flank), was successful, although it cost the life of Major Pitcairn.²⁹ The defenders had run out of ammunition, reducing the battle to close combat. The British had the advantage once they entered the redoubt, as their troops were equipped with bayonets on their muskets but most of the Colonists were not. Colonel Prescott, one of the last Colonists to leave the redoubt, parried bayonet thrusts with his normally ceremonial sabre.³⁰ It is in the retreat from the redoubt that Joseph Warren was killed. The retreat of the Colonists was made possible in part by the valiant defense of the forces to the north of redoubt, which prevented the encirclement of those men. General Putnam attempted to reform the troops on Bunker Hill; however the flight of the Colonial forces was so rapid that artillery pieces and entrenching tools had to be abandoned. The Colonials suffered most of their casualties during the retreat on Bunker Hill. By 5 p.m., the Colonials had retreated over the Charlestown Neck to fortified positions in Cambridge, and the British were in control of the peninsula.³¹

Aftermath

The British had taken the ground but at a great loss; they suffered 1,054 casualties (226 dead and 828 wounded), and a disproportionate number of these were officers. General Clinton remarked in his diary that "A few more such victories would have shortly put an end to British dominion in America."³² The Colonial losses were only about 450, of whom 140, including Joseph Warren, were killed, and 30 were captured, of whom 20 died later as POWs. Most Colonial losses came during the withdrawal. Major Andrew McClary was the highest ranking Colonial officer to die in the battle. He would later be commemorated by the dedication of Fort McClary in Kittery, Maine.³³

British dead and wounded included 100 commissioned officers, a significant portion of the British officer corps in North America.³⁴ Much of General Howe's field staff was among the casualties.³⁵ Major Pitcairn had been killed, and Colonel James Abercrombie fatally wounded. General Gage, in his report after the battle, reported the following officer casualties (listing lieutenants and above by name):³⁶

• 1 lieutenant colonel killed
• 2 majors killed, 3 wounded
• 7 captains killed, 27 wounded
• 9 lieutenants killed, 32 wounded
• 15 sergeants killed, 42 wounded
• 1 drummer killed, 12 wounded

Thomas Gage, who would be recalled to England and replaced by General Howe in October 1775, wrote a report to the British Cabinet, in which he repeated earlier warnings that "a large army must at length be employed to reduce these people" and would require "the hiring of foreign troops."³⁷

Analysis

Much has been written in the wake of this battle over how it was conducted. Both sides made strategic and tactical missteps which could have altered the outcome of the battle. While hindsight often gives a biased view, some things seem to apparent after the battle that might reasonably be within the reach of the command of the day.

Colonial faults

The British plan of attack for breaking out of Boston had been to first take control of Dorchester Heights. These hills held a more commanding and threatening position over the Boston peninsula and harbor than those of Charlestown (as demonstrated by the withdrawal of the British after they were fortified by the Colonial army in March 1776). Furthermore, the access to the hills from Roxbury was not nearly as constraining as the Charlestown Neck was for access to Bunker Hill. The Committee of Safety, which was the nominal guiding political force at the time of the battle, was apparently unaware of the military significance of the Dorchester Heights.³⁸

The Colonial forces, while nominally under the overall command of General Ward, with General Putnam leading in the field, often acted quite independently. This was evident in the opening page of the drama, when a tactical decision was made that had strategic implications. Colonel Prescott and his staff, apparently in contravention of orders, decided to fortify Breed's Hill rather than Bunker Hill.¹⁴ The fortification of Breed's Hill was more provocative; it would have put offensive artillery closer to Boston. It also exposed the forces there to the possibility of being trapped, as they probably could not properly defend against attempts by the British to land troops and take control of Charlestown Neck. If the British had taken that step, they might have had a victory with many fewer casualties.³⁹

While the front lines of the Colonial forces were generally well managed, the scene behind them, especially once the action began, was significantly disorganized, due at least in part to a poor chain of command. Only some of the militias operated directly under Ward's and Putnam's authority,⁴⁰ and some also disobeyed orders, staying at Bunker Hill rather than joining in the defense on the third British assault. Several officers would afterward be court-martialed or cashiered.⁴¹ Had Prescott and the forces in the redoubt been reinforced with either more forces, or adequate supplies of ammunition and powder, he was of the opinion that they would have succeeded in throwing back the third assault.⁴²

British faults

The British leadership, for their part, was slow to act once the works on Breed's Hill were spotted. It was 2 p.m. when the troops were ready for the assault, roughly eight hours later. This leisurely pace gave the Colonial forces time to reinforce the flanking positions that had been poorly defended.⁴³ Gage and Howe decided that a frontal assault on the works would be a simple matter, when an encircling move (gaining control of Charlestown Neck), would have given them a more resounding victory.³⁹ (This move would not have been without risks of its own, as the Colonials could have made holding the Neck expensive with fire from the high ground in Cambridge.) But the British leadership was excessively optimistic, believing that "two regiments were sufficient to beat the strength of the province".⁴⁴

Once in the field, Howe, rather than focusing on the redoubt, opted (twice!) to dilute the force attacking the redoubt with a flanking maneuver against the Colonial left. It was only with the third attack, when the flank attack was merely a feint,⁴⁵ and the main force (now also reinforced with additional reserves) was squarely targeted at the redoubt, that the attack succeeded.²⁸

Following the taking of the peninsula, the British arguably had a tactical advantage that they could have used to press into Cambridge. General Clinton proposed this to Howe, who declined the idea.⁴⁶ Howe was eventually recognized by the Colonial military leaders to be a tentative decision-maker, to his detriment; in the aftermath of the Battle of Long Island, he again had tactical advantages that might have delivered Washington's army into his hands; he again refused to act.⁴⁷

"The whites of their eyes"

The famous order, "Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes" was popularized in stories about the battle of Bunker Hill. However, it is uncertain as to who said it, since various histories attribute it to Putnam, Stark, Prescott or Gridley, and it may have been said first by one, and repeated by the others. It was also likely not an original statement. The earliest similar quote came from the Battle of Dettingen on 27 June 1743, where Lieutenant-Colonel Andrew Agnew of Lochnaw warned his Regiment, the Royal Scots Fusiliers, not to fire until they could "see the white's of their e'en."⁴⁸ The phrase was also used by Prince Charles of Prussia in 1745, and repeated in 1755 by Frederick the Great, and may have been mentioned in histories the Colonial military leaders were familiar with.⁴⁹ Whether or not it was actually said in this battle, it was clear that the Colonial military leadership were regularly reminding their troops to hold their fire until the moment when it would have the greatest effect.⁵⁰

Colonial Volunteers

A significant number of notable Colonists fought in this battle. Some (as in all battles) fought with distinction. Others were already well-known, or would go on to play important roles in the war, or in the politics of the United States.

• William Barton, captured General Richard Prescott in 1777
• John Brooks physician, future Major General, future Governor of Massachusetts
• Henry Burbeck, future Brigadier General, also fought in the War of 1812
• Henry Dearborn, physician, Congressman, Secretary of War, Major General and Senior Officer of the United States Army, Minister Plenipotentiary to Portugal
• William Eustis, physician, Congressman, Secretary of War, Governor of Massachusetts, Ambassador to Holland
• Christian Febiger, Brigadier General (by brevet), Treasurer for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
• Thomas Gardner, Colonel, mortally wounded at the Battle of Bunker Hill
• Thomas Knowlton, Colonel, went on to lead intelligence and reconnaissance corps under Washington
• Henry Knox, Major General, Secretary of War
• Barzillai Lew, an African-American
• James Otis, famous for popularizing the phrase "Taxation without representation"
• Salem Poor, an African-American who fought with distinction in the battle
• Israel Potter, immortalized in a novel by Herman Melville
• Peter Salem, aka "Salem Middlesex", an African-American
• Daniel Shays, who would lead an army of farmers in Shays' Rebellion
• William Stacy, Colonel, lead settler of the Ohio Country after independence

Commemorations

• The Bunker Hill Monument is an obelisk that stands 220 feet (67 m) high on Bunker Hill. On June 17, 1825, the fiftieth anniversary of the battle, the cornerstone of the monument was laid by the Marquis de Lafayette and an address delivered by Daniel Webster.⁵¹ There is also a statue of Prescott in the famous pose used to show him calming his "farmers" down. The Leonard P. Zakim Bunker Hill Bridge was specifically designed to evoke this monument.⁵²
• Bunker Hill Day, commemorating the battle, is a legal holiday in Suffolk County, Massachusetts (which includes the city of Boston) as well as Somerville in Middlesex County. State institutions in Massachusetts (such as public higher education) also celebrate the holiday.

See also

• Royal Welch Fusiliers
• New England
• Breed's Hill

Notes

References and further reading

• Alden, John R. A History of the American Revolution, Da Capo. ISBN 0-306-80366-6. 
• Anderson, William (1863). The Scottish Nation: Or, The Surnames, Families, Literature, Honours, and Biographical History of the People of Scotland. 2, Fullarton, http://books.google.com/books?id=otxpAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA679&dq=Agnew+cavalry+Dettingen&as_brr=3. 
• Bardwell, John D (2005). Old Kittery, Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 9780738524764. 
• Brooks, Victor (1999). The Boston Campaign, Combined Publishing. ISBN 1580970079. 
• Chidsey, Donald Barr (1966). The Siege of Boston, Crown. 
• Clinton, Henry; Willcox, William B. (ed) (1954). The American Rebellion: Sir Henry Clinton's Narrative of His Campaigns, 1775-1782, Yale University Press, http://books.google.com/books?id=H2AsAAAAMAAJ. 
• Doyle, Peter (1998). Bunker Hill, Providence Foundation. ISBN 1-887456-08-2. 
• Elting, John R. (1975). The Battle of Bunker's Hill, Phillip Freneau Press. ISBN 0-912480-11-4. 
• Fast, Howard (2001). Bunker Hill, ibooks inc. ISBN 0-7434-2384-4. 
• French, Allen (1911). The Siege of Boston, McMillan, http://books.google.com/books?id=PqZcY9z3Vn4C. 
• Frothingham, Jr, Richard (1851). History of the Siege of Boston and of the Battles of Lexington, Concord, and Bunker Hill, Second Edition, Charles C. Little and James Brown, http://books.google.com/books?id=xl4sAAAAMAAJ. 
• Graydon, Alexander; Littell, John Stockton (ed) (1846). Memoirs of His Own Time: With Reminiscences of the Men and Events of the Revolution, Lindsay & Blakiston, http://books.google.com/books?id=wvQEAAAAYAAJ. 
• Hayward, John (1854). A Gazetteer of the United States of America, self published, http://books.google.com/books?id=hlJ_1U2IaAIC. 
• Hirsch, Jr, E.D.; Kett, Joseph F.; Trefil, James (2002). The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition, Houghton Mifflin. 
• Jackson, Kenneth T; Dunbar, David S (2005). Empire City: New York Through the Centuries, Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231109093. 
• Ketchum, Richard (1999). Decisive Day: The Battle of Bunker Hill, Owl Books. ISBN 0-385-41897-3.  (Paperback: ISBN 0-8050-6099-5)
• Scheer, George F; Rankin, Hugh F (1987). Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolution Through the Eyes of Those Who Fought and Lived It, Da Capo Press. ISBN 9780306803079. 
• Swett, S (1826). History of Bunker Hill Battle, With a Plan, Second Edition, Munroe and Francis, http://books.google.com/books?id=QM3KyrZKnZAC. 
• Winsor, Justin; Jewett, Clarence F (1882). The Memorial History of Boston: Including Suffolk County, Massachusetts, 1630-1880. 3, James R. Osgood, http://books.google.com/books?id=z64TAAAAYAAJ. 
• "Charles River Bridges". Massachusetts Turnpike Authority. Retrieved on 2008-11-26.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Battle of Bunker Hill

Pages about the battle

• Library of Congress page about the battle
• Bunker Hill Web Exhibit of the Massachusetts Historical Society
• SAR Sons of Liberty Chapter list of colonial fallen at Bunker Hill
• SAR Sons of Liberty Chapter description of the battle
• The Battle of Bunker Hill: Now We Are at War, a National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places (TwHP) lesson plan
• TheAmericanRevolution.org description of the battle
• BritishBattles.com description of the battle

Pages about people in the battle

• WGBH Forum Network-Patriots of Color:Revolutionary Heroes
• Israel Putnam Website
• Genealogy of Captain Samuel Cherry, who fought at Bunker Hill

Other external pages

• Boston National Historical Park Official Website

Wikipedia content modification information:

• This page was last modified on 4 December 2008, at 19:39.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Battle of Bunker Hill".

The URL for this specific entry is:

• http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Battle_of_Bunker_Hill

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.