This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on E-10 MC2A is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
| E-10 MC2A | |
|---|---|
| Role | Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) |
| Manufacturer | Northrop Grumman |
| Status | Canceled |
| Primary user | United States Air Force |
| Developed from | Boeing 767 |
| Variants | Boeing E-767 Boeing KC-767 |
The Northrop Grumman E-10 MC2A was planned as a multi-role military aircraft to replace the Boeing 707 based E-3 Sentry, E-8 Joint STARS, and RC-135 Rivet Joint aircraft in US service. It was based on the 767-400ER commercial airplane.
Contents |
Development
In 2003, the Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and Raytheon MC2A Team was awarded a $215 million pre-SDD (System Development and Demonstration) contract for the development of the aircraft.
While the Northrop Grumman E-8 Joint STARS aircraft are a recent development, they will be the last such type to be based on the 707. To install the high technology systems envisaged for the MC2A on an increasingly obsolete airframe would not provide the capability required. The availability of powerful and reliable turbofans allowed a twinjet to be considered.
MC2A stands for Multi-Sensor Command and Control Aircraft. The MC2A was intended to be the ultimate theater-wide combat control center.
In August 2003 Air International reported that the goal of integrating air- and ground-search radars on a single airframe was abandoned. Electronic interference between the AESA and ground-surveillance radars as well as the power requirements for both systems were cited as the reason. Instead the USAF decided to plan two separate E-10 fleets to be integrated with the proposed Space-Based Radar system, air and space-based ELINT/SIGINT assets, and space-based IMINT satellites. It would have been the central command authority for all air, land, and sea forces in a combat theater. The E-10 was also considered for use as a command center for unmanned combat air vehicles.
The capability of the MC2A was to be raised incrementally, with each phase known as a "spiral."
- Spiral 1 - Multi-Platform Radar Technology Insertion Program (MP-RTIP)
This version would have provided substantial Joint Cruise Missile Defense (CMD) capability with focused AMTI modes and augment the E-8 Joint STARS in the ground surveillance role. - Spiral 2 - AWACS Capability
This version would have replaced the E-3. It was expected that the Spiral 2 version would use a variant of the Boeing Wedgetail's Multi-role Electronically Scanned Array. - Spiral 3 - SIGINT Platform
This version was intended to replace a wide range of SIGINT/ELINT aircraft. No plans existed to develop this version.
Scale-back
In January 2006, the Air Force FY07 budget request revealed a reshaping of the E-10 program, with the cancellation of the E-10A SDD program, but maintained funding for the development and testing of a single demonstration aircraft, now known as the E-10A Technology Development Program (TDP).1 The TDP would flight test the MP-RTIP Wide-Area Surveillance (WAS) radar, and conduct flight demonstrations of the E-10A's Cruise Missile Defense (CMD) Capability. The SDD elimination was designed to be a cost cutting measure and part of a larger reorganization and redefinition of the Air Force's mission including the retirement of the E-4B and F-117 fleets, as well as the elimination of all but 58 B-52s.
Cancellation
The E-10 finally disappeared at the end of FY2007 as budget pressures and competing priorities pushed it completely out of the budget. The USAF maintained funding for the MP-RTIP radar and may eventually put the radar on the E-8, or on a new aircraft, possibly the same airframe as the next aerial tanker.2 The smaller version of the MP-RTIP AESA radar designed to be flown on the RQ-4B Global Hawk is being flight tested on the Scaled Composites Proteus aircraft. Boeing has kept the E-10 prototype (767-400ER) at Paine Field in Everett, Washington. The prototype is expected be sold to a commercial customer in the future.3
Specifications (767-400ER)
This aircraft article is missing some (or all) of its specifications. If you have a source, you can help Wikipedia by adding them.Data from B767-400ER4
General characteristics
- Crew: 2
- Length: 201 ft 4 in (61.3 m)
- Wingspan: 170 ft 4 in (51.9 m)
- Height: 55 ft 4 in (16.8 m)
- Empty weight: 229,000 lb (103,872 kg)
- Max takeoff weight: 450,000 lb (204,116 kg)
- Powerplant: 2× P&W PW4000-94 or GE CF6-80C turbofan, PW: 63,300 lbf or GE: 63,500 lbf (PW: 281.6 kN or GE: 282.5 kN) each
Performance
- Maximum speed: Mach 0.86 (568 mph, 913 km/h)
- Cruise speed: Mach 0.80 (530 mph, 851 km/h)
- Range: 5,600 nmi (10,370 km)
- Service ceiling 40,100 ft (12,200 m)
See also
Related development
Comparable aircraft
References
- ^ "Boeing Polishes 737 Design For EP-3 Replacement : Mixed Signals." Fulghum, D. A. and Wall, R. Aviation Week & Space Technology. January 29, 2006.
- ^ Tirpak, John A. "The big squeeze", Air Force Magazine. October 2007.
- ^ Boeing 767-400ER E-10A, spyflight.co.uk. web page updated 3 June 2008.
- ^ Boeing 767-400ER Technical Characteristics
External links
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
||||||||||||||
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 3 October 2008, at 23:09.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "E-10 MC2A".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.