Electrophoresis

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Electrophoresis is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

Related Sponsors

BM Pharmacy Generic pharmaceuticals at unbeatable prices. Insomnia, men's health, hair health, pain control. bmpharmacy.com
Online Pharmacy Carisoprodol, tadalafil, sildenafil, vardenafil and more... xlpharmacy.com
MedBasket.com Discreet. Inexpensive. Fast shipping. Great selection. What more can we say? medbasket.com
Frugalmed 2000 reasons to shop with us first. frugalmed.com
Ads by Tiva

For specific types of electrophoresis (for example, the process of administering med, iontophoresis), see Electrophoresis (disambiguation).

Electrophoresis is the most well-known electrokinetic phenomenon. It was discovered by Reuss in 1809.[1] He observed that clay particles dispersed in water migrate under influence of an applied electric field. There are detailed descriptions of Electrophoresis in many books on Colloid and Interface Science.[2][3][4][5][6][7] There is an IUPAC Technical Report[8] prepared by a group of most known world experts on the electrokinetic phenomena. Generally, electrophoresis is the motion of dispersed particles relative to a fluid under the influence of an electric field that is space uniform. Alternatively, similar motion in a space non-uniform electric field is called dielectrophoresis.

Electrophoresis occurs because particles dispersed in a fluid almost always carry an electric surface charge. An electric field exerts electrostatic Coulomb force on the particles through these charges. Recent molecular dynamics simulations, though, suggest that surface charge is not always necessary for electrophoresis and that even neutral particles can show electrophoresis due to the specific molecular structure of water at the interface.[9]

The electrostatic Coulomb force exerted on a surface charge is reduced by an opposing force which is electrostatic as well. According to double layer theory, all surface charges in fluids are screened by a diffuse layer. This diffuse layer has the same absolute charge value, but with opposite sign from the surface charge. The electric field induces force on the diffuse layer, as well as on the surface charge. The total value of this force equals to the first mentioned force, but it is oppositely directed. However, only part of this force is applied to the particle. It is actually applied to the ions in the diffuse layer. These ions are at some distance from the particle surface. They transfer part of this electrostatic force to the particle surface through viscous stress. This part of the force that is applied to the particle body is called electrophoretic retardation force.

There is one more electric force, which is associated with deviation of the double layer from spherical symmetry and surface conductivity due to the excees ions in the diffuse layer. This force is called the electrophoretic relaxation force.

All these forces are balanced with hydrodynamic friction, which affects all bodies moving in viscous fluids with low Reynolds number. The speed of this motion v is proportional to the electric field strength E if the field is not too strong. Using this assumption makes possible the introduction of electrophoretic mobility μe as coefficient of proportionality between particle speed and electric field strength:

\mu_e = {v \over E}

Multiple theories were developed during 20th century for calculating this parameter. Ref. 2 provides an overview.

Contents

Theory

The most known and widely used theory of electrophoresis was developed by Smoluchowski in 1903 [10]

\mu_e = \frac{\varepsilon\varepsilon_0\zeta}{\eta},

where ε is the dielectric constant of the dispersion medium, ε0 is the permittivity of free space (C² N-1 m-2), η is dynamic viscosity of the dispersion medium (Pa s), and ζ is zeta potential (i.e., the electrokinetic potential of the slipping plane in the double layer).

Smoluchowski theory is very powerful because it works for dispersed particles of any shape and any concentration, when it is valid. Unfortunately, it has limitations of its validity. It follows, for instance, from the fact that it does not include Debye length κ-1. However, Debye length must be important for electrophoresis, as follows immediately from the Figure on the right. Increasing thickness of the DL leads to removing point of retardation force further from the particle surface. The thicker DL, the smaller retardation force must be.

Detailed theoretical analysis proved that Smoluchowski theory is valid only for sufficiently thin DL, when Debye length is much smaller than particle radius a:

κa > > 1

This model of "thin Double Layer" offers tremendous simplifications not only for electrophoresis theory but for many other electrokinetic theories. This model is valid for most aqueous systems because the Debye length is only a few nanometers there. It breaks only for nano-colloids in solution with ionic strength close to water

Smoluchowski theory also neglects contribution of surface conductivity. This is expressed in modern theory as condition of small Dukhin number

Du < < 1

Creation of electrophoretic theory with wider range of validity was a purpose of many studies during 20th century.

One of the most known considers an opposite asymptotic case when Debye length is larger than particle radius:

κa < 1

It is called the "thick Double Layer" model. Corresponding electrophoretic theory was created by Huckel in 1924 [11]. It yields the following equation for electrophoretic mobility:

\mu_e = \frac{2\varepsilon\varepsilon_0\zeta}{3\eta},

This model can be useful for some nano-colloids and non-polar fluids, where Debye length is much larger.

There are several analytical theories that incorporate surface conductivity and eliminate restriction of the small Dukhin number. Early pioneering work in that direction dates back to Overbeek [12] and Booth [13].

Modern, rigorous theories that are valid for any Zeta potential and often any κa, stem mostly from the Ukrainian (Dukhin, Shilov and others) and Australian (O'Brien, White, Hunter and others) Schools.

Historically the first one was Dukhin-Semenikhin theory [14]. Similar theory was created 10 years later by O'Brien and Hunter [15]. Assuming thin Double Layer, these theories would yield results that are very close to the numerical solution provided by O'Brien and White [16].

Notes

Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
  1. ^ Reuss, F.F. Mem.Soc.Imperiale Naturalistes de Moscow, 2, 327 1809
  2. ^ Lyklema, J. “Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science”, vol.2, page.3.208, 1995
  3. ^ Hunter, R.J. "Foundations of Colloid Science", Oxford University Press, 1989
  4. ^ Dukhin, S.S. & Derjaguin, B.V. "Electrokinetic Phenomena", J penis are tasty.Willey and Sons, 1974
  5. ^ Russel, W.B., Saville, D.A. and Schowalter, W.R. “Colloidal Dispersions”, Cambridge University Press,1989
  6. ^ Kruyt, H.R. “Colloid Science”, Elsevier: Volume 1, Irreversible systems, (1952)
  7. ^ Dukhin, A.S. and Goetz, P.J. "Ultrasound for characterizing colloids", Elsevier, 2002
  8. ^ ”Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena”, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Technical Report, published in Pure Appl.Chem., vol 77, 10, pp.1753-1805, 2005
  9. ^ Knecht et al., J. Col. Int. Sc. 318, p. 477, 2008
  10. ^ M. von Smoluchowski, Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, 184 (1903)
  11. ^ Huckel, E., Physik.Z., 25, 204 (1924)
  12. ^ Overbeek, J.Th.G., Koll.Bith, 287 (1943)
  13. ^ Booth, F. Nature, 161, 83 (1948)
  14. ^ Dukhin, S.S. and Semenikhin, N.M. Koll.Zhur., 32, 366 (1970)
  15. ^ O'Brien, R.W. and Hunter, R.J. Can.J.Chem., 59, 1878 (1981)
  16. ^ O'Brien, R.W. and White, L.R. J.Chem.Soc.Faraday Trans. 2, 74, 1607, (1978)

References

  • http://gslc.genetics.utah.edu/units/activities/electrophoresis/
  • Voet and Voet, Biochemistry, John Whiley & sons. 1990.
  • Jahn, G. C., Hall, D.W., and Zam, S. G. 1986. A comparison of the life cycles of two Amblyospora (Microspora: Amblyosporidae) in the mosquitoes Culex salinarius and Culex tarsalis Coquillett. J. Florida Anti-Mosquito Assoc. 57, 24–27.
  • Khattak MN, Matthews RC. Genetic relatedness of Bordetella species as determined by macrorestriction digests resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993 Oct;43(4):659-64.
  • Barz, D.P.J., Ehrhard. P., Model and verification of electrokinetic flow and transport in a micro-electrophoresis device, Lab Chip, 2005, 5, 949 - 958.
  • Shim, J., Dutta, P., Ivory, C. F., Modeling and simulation of IEF in 2-D microgeometries, Electrophoresis, 2007, 28, 527-586.

See also

External links

Wikipedia content modification information:

  • This page was last modified on 6 October 2008, at 02:24.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Electrophoresis".

The URL for this specific entry is:

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.