Happy Planet Index

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Happy Planet Index is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

Happy Planet Index,  highest rank  to  lowest rank .
Happy Planet Index, highest rank to lowest rank .

The Happy Planet Index (HPI) is an index of human well-being and environmental impact, introduced by the New Economics Foundation (NEF), in July 2006. The index is designed to challenge well-established indices of countries’ development, such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the Human Development Index (HDI), which are seen as not taking sustainability into account. In particular, GDP is seen as inappropriate, as the ultimate aim of most people is not to be rich, but to be happy and healthy.[1]. Further, the notion of sustainable development requires that we have a measure of the environmental costs of pursuing those goals.[2]

Contents

Outline

The HPI is based on general utilitarian principles — that most people want to live long and fulfilling lives, and the country which is doing the best is the one that allows its citizens to do so, whilst avoiding infringing on the opportunity of future people and people in other countries to do the same. In effect it operationalises the IUCN's (World Conservation Union) call for a metric capable of measuring 'the production of human well-being (not necessarily material goods) per unit of extraction of or imposition upon nature'.[3] Human well-being is operationalised as Happy Life Years.[4] Extraction of or imposition upon nature is proxied for using the ecological footprint per capita, which attempts to estimate the amount of natural resources required to sustain a given country's lifestyle. A country with a large per capita ecological footprint uses more than its fair share of resources, both by drawing resources from other countries, but also by causing permanent damage to the planet which will impact future generations.[5]

As such, the HPI is not a measure of which are the happiest countries in the world. Countries with relatively high levels of life satisfaction, as measured in surveys, are found from the very top (Colombia in 2nd place) to the very bottom (the USA in 150th place) of the rank order. The HPI is best conceived as a measure of the environmental efficiency of supporting well-being in a given country. Such efficiency could emerge in a country with a medium environmental impact (e.g. Costa Rica) and very high well-being (e.g. Panama), but it could also emerge in a country with only mediocre well-being, but very low environmental impact (e.g. Vietnam).

Each country’s HPI value is a function of its average subjective life satisfaction, life expectancy at birth, and ecological footprint per capita. The exact function is a little more complex, but conceptually it approximates multiplying life satisfaction and life expectancy, and dividing that by the ecological footprint. Most of the life satisfaction data is taken from the World Values Survey, but some is drawn from other surveys, and some is estimated using statistical regression techniques.

The best scoring country in 2006 is the island state of Vanuatu, followed by Colombia and Costa Rica, while Burundi, Swaziland and Zimbabwe form the bottom of the list.

Views

Green = Happiest > Blue > Purple > Orange > Red = Least Happy; Grey = Data not available The Satisfaction with Life Index shows life satisfaction scores from the HPI without adjusting for ecological footprint and life expectancy.
Green = Happiest > Blue > Purple > Orange > Red = Least Happy; Grey = Data not available The Satisfaction with Life Index shows life satisfaction scores from the HPI without adjusting for ecological footprint and life expectancy.

Much criticism of the index has been due to commentators falsely understanding it to be a measure of happiness, when it is in fact a measure of the ecological efficiency of supporting well-being (see, for example, the following blogs in Heavy Lifting[6] and Spiked[7]).

Aside from that, criticism has focused on the following:

  • That the World Values Survey covers only a minority of the world's nations and is only done every five years. As a result, much of the data for the index must come from other sources, or is estimated using regressions.
  • General suspicion of subjective measures of well-being.[8]
  • That the Ecological Footprint is a controversial concept with many criticisms.[9]

Nevertheless, the HPI and its subcomponents have been considered in political circles. The Ecological Footprint, championed by the WWF, is widely used by both local and national governments, as well as supranational organisations such as the European Commission. The HPI itself was recently cited in the British Conservative Party as a possible substitute for GDP, [10] . A recent review of progress indicators produced by the European Parliament[11], lists the following pros and cons to using the HPI as a measure of national progress:

Pros:

  • Considers the actual ‘ends’ of economic activity in the form of life satisfaction and longevity
  • Combines wellbeing and environmental aspects
  • Simple and easily understandable scheme for calculating the index
  • Comparability of results (‘EF’ and ‘life expectancy’ can be applied to different countries)
  • Data online available, although some data gaps remain
  • Mixture of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ criteria; takes into account people’s well-being and resource use of countries

Cons:

  • ‘Happiness’ or ‘life satisfaction’ are very subjective and personal: cultural influences and complex impact of policies on happiness
  • Confusion of name: index is not a measure of happiness but rather measure of environmental efficiency of supporting well-being in a given country

International Ranking

Rank Country HPI Rank Country HPI
1  Vanuatu 68.21 90  India 42.46
2  Colombia 67.24 91  Cambodia 42.15
3  Costa Rica 66.00 92  Albania 42.13
4  Dominica 64.55 93  Jordan 42.05
5  Panama 63.54 94  New Zealand 41.92
6  Cuba 61.86 95  Japan 41.70
7  Honduras 61.75 96  Republic of the Congo 41.59
8  Guatemala 61.69 97  Egypt 41.58
9  El Salvador 61.66 98  Turkey 41.40
10  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 61.37 99  Denmark 41.40
11  Saint Lucia 61.31 100  Brunei 41.16
12  Vietnam 61.23 101  Georgia 41.15
13  Bhutan 61.08 102  South Korea 41.11
14  Samoa 60.98 103  Bosnia and Herzegovina 40.96
15  Sri Lanka 60.31 104  Senegal 40.81
16  Antigua and Barbuda 59.23 105  Azerbaijan 40.69
17  Philippines 59.17 106  Gabon 40.52
18  Nicaragua 59.09 107  Libya 40.33
19  Kyrgyzstan 59.05 108  United Kingdom 40.29
20  Solomon Islands 58.93 109  Laos 40.26
21  Tunisia 58.92 110  Benin 40.10
22  São Tomé and Príncipe 57.92 111  Canada 39.76
23  Indonesia 57.90 112  Pakistan 39.40
24  Tonga 57.90 113  Ireland 39.38
25  Tajikistan 57.66 114  Poland 39.29
26  Venezuela 57.55 115  Norway 39.18
27  Dominican Republic 57.14 116  Republic of Macedonia 39.14
28  Guyana 56.65 117  Israel 39.07
29  Saint Kitts and Nevis 56.14 118  Namibia 38.41
30  Seychelles 56.07 119  Sweden 38.17
31  China 55.99 120  Romania 37.72
32  Thailand 55.39 121  Hungary 37.64
33  Peru 55.14 122  Guinea 37.42
34  Suriname 55.03 123  Finland 37.36
35  Yemen 55.00 124  Mauritania 37.30
36  Fiji 54.47 125  Kazakhstan 36.92
37  Morocco 54.43 126  Togo 36.86
38  Mexico 54.39 127  Kenya 36.70
39  Maldives 53.52 128  Czech Republic 36.59
40  Malta 53.26 129  France 36.42
41  Bangladesh 53.20 130  Armenia 36.15
42  Comoros 52.92 131  Singapore 36.14
43  Barbados 52.73 132  Slovakia 35.81
44  Malaysia 52.69 133  Greece 35.71
45  Palestinian Authority 52.64 134  Tanzania 35.08
46  Cape Verde 52.41 135  Guinea-Bissau 35.08
47  Chile 52.20 136  Portugal 34.83
48  Timor-Leste 52.04 137  Eritrea 34.49
49  Argentina 51.96 138  Bahrain 34.35
50  Trinidad and Tobago 51.87 139  Australia 34.06
51  Belize 51.32 140  Mali 33.68
52  Paraguay 51.13 141  Mozambique 33.01
53  Jamaica 51.01 142  Cameroon 32.76
54  Nepal 49.95 143  Djibouti 32.72
55  Mauritius 49.65 144  Ethiopia 32.53
56  Mongolia 49.59 145  Bulgaria 31.59
57  Uruguay 49.31 146  Nigeria 31.14
58  Ecuador 49.29 147  Moldova 31.12
59  Uzbekistan 49.22 148  Burkina Faso 30.08
60  Grenada 48.96 149  Lithuania 29.29
61  Austria 48.77 150  United States 28.83
62  The Gambia 48.67 151  Côte d'Ivoire 28.80
63  Brazil 48.59 152  Rwanda 28.35
64  Iceland 48.35 153  Sierra Leone 28.24
65  Switzerland 48.30 154  United Arab Emirates 28.20
66  Italy 48.26 155  Angola 27.88
67  Iran 47.23 156  South Africa 27.80
68  Ghana 46.98 157  Sudan 27.74
69  Bolivia 46.17 158  Uganda 27.68
70  Netherlands 46.00 159  Kuwait 27.67
71  Madagascar 45.99 160  Latvia 27.27
72  Cyprus 45.99 161  Niger 26.80
73  Algeria 45.89 162  Malawi 26.66
74  Luxembourg 45.62 163  Zambia 25.91
75  Bahamas 44.90 164  Central African Republic 25.90
76  Papua New Guinea 44.75 165  Belarus 25.78
77  Myanmar 44.55 166  Qatar 25.50
78  Belgium 44.04 167  Botswana 25.42
79  Slovenia 44.03 168  Chad 25.37
80  Oman 43.94 169  Turkmenistan 23.96
81  Germany 43.83 170  Equatorial Guinea 23.77
82  Croatia 43.71 171  Lesotho 23.05
83  Lebanon 43.64 172  Russia 22.76
84  Taiwan 43.41 173  Estonia 22.68
85  Haiti 43.34 174  Ukraine 22.21
86  Syria 43.23 175  Democratic Republic of the Congo 20.69
87  Spain 43.04 176  Burundi 19.02
88  Hong Kong 42.88 177  Swaziland 18.38
89  Saudi Arabia 42.65 178  Zimbabwe 16.64

Notes

  1. ^ Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. 0192893300. 
  2. ^ Hawken, Paul; Lovins, Amory, and Hovins, L. Hunter (1999). Natural Capitalism. New York, New York: Little Brown & Co.. 0316353000. }}
  3. ^ Adams WM (2006). The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting. Also, Paehlke R (2005). Sustainability as a bridging concept. Conservation Biology 19:36-8.
  4. ^ Veenhoven R (1996). Happy life expectancy: a comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research 39:1-58.
  5. ^ Global Footprint Network :: HOME - Ecological Footprint - Ecological Sustainability
  6. ^ Heavy Lifting
  7. ^ spiked | Who’s happiest: Denmark or Vanuatu?
  8. ^ Johns H & Ormerod P (2007). Happiness, Economics and Public Policy. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs
  9. ^ The Economist, 19th Sep 2002, Treading Lightly
  10. ^ Cameron to offer green tax cuts - Times Online
  11. ^ Goossens Y, et al. (2007). Alternative progress indicators to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a means towards sustainable development. IP/A/ENVI/ST/2007-10. Study provided for the European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Available at http://www.beyond-gdp.eu/background-papers.html

External links

See also