This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Induction (birth) is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
 |
This article or section is missing citations or needs footnotes. Using inline citations helps guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (March 2007) |
Induction is a method of artificially or prematurely stimulating labour in a woman.[1]
Common causes for induction include:
- The baby is believed to be getting too big.
- Postdate pregnancy, i.e. if the pregnancy has gone past the 42 week mark.
- Intrauterine fetal growth retardation (IUGR).
- There are health risks to the woman in continuing the pregnancy (e.g. she has pre-eclampsia).
- Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM); this is when the membranes rupture, but labour does not start within a specific amount of time.[2]
- Premature termination of the pregnancy (abortion).
- Scheduling concerns.
- Fetal death in utero.
Contents |
Methods of induction
Methods of inducing labour include:
- "Membrane sweep", also known as membrane stripping, or "stretch and sweep" in Australia and the UK - during an internal examination, the midwife moves her finger around the cervix to stimulate and/or separate the membranes around the baby from the cervix. This causes a release of prostaglandins which can help to kick-start labour.
- Artificial rupture of the membranes (AROM or ARM) ("breaking the waters")
- Cervically-applied prostaglandin, such as dinoprostone (Cervidil) or misoprostol.
- Intravenous administration of synthetic oxytocin preparations, such as Pitocin.
- Natural Induction - Many midwives or other holistic providers practice "natural" induction, which may include use of herbs, castor oil or other agents to stimulate or advance a stalled labor. The safety of such practices is undetermined. Women should not try to induce labor without talking with their physician or other healthcare provider, and certainly not before 37 weeks gestation.
If an induction causes complications during labor, a Caesarean section is almost always conducted. An induction is most likely to result in successful vaginal delivery when a woman is close to or in the early stages of labor. Signs of pending labor may include softening of the cervix, dilation and increasing frequency or intensity of contractions.
Criticisms of induction
Induced labour tends to be more intense and painful for the woman, often leading to the increased use of analgesics and other pain-relieving pharmaceuticals (Vernon, 2005). This cascade of intervention has been shown to lead to an increased likelihood of caesarean section delivery for the baby. (Roberts 2000). Inductions should only be undertaken for significant medical reasons, but some feel that doctors show increasing propensity toward induction simply for personal convenience or to relieve load on hospital facilities. "[Induction] enables doctors to practice daylight obstetrics," says Dr. Marsden Wagner, a neonatologist who served for 15 years as a director of women's and children's health in industrialized countries for the World Health Organization. "It means that as a doctor, I can come in at 9 a.m., give you the pill, and by 6 p.m. I've delivered a baby and am home having dinner." [3] A growing number of pregnant women are opting to have induced labor, according to a 12-year study of women in Illinois that was published in the September 2008 issue of the journal Medical Care. The researchers say that the consequences are not clear, but some believe that elective inductions will be done for convenience reasons.[4]
References
- ^ Houghton Mifflin Company, (2006): The American Heritage Dictionary.
- ^ Allahyar,J. & Galan, H. "Premature Rupture of the Membranes."; also American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists.
- ^ Uterine Ruptures Associated with Prostaglandin Used with RU486 Accessed 20 Feb 2008
- ^ Pregnant Illinois Women Increasingly Choosing Induced Labor Newswise, Retrieved on September 18, 2008.
- Roberts, Tracy, Peat, 2000 Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study Christine L Roberts, Sally Tracy, Brian Peat, "British Medical Journal", v321:140 July 2000
- Vernon, David, Having a Great Birth in Australia, Australian College of Midwives, 2005, ISBN 0-9751674-3-X
- Goodman, David, "Forced Labor", Mother Jones
External links
- Family.doctor.org
- Harman & Kim. "Current Trends in Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction" American Family Physician 1999; 60:477-84.
- Inducing Labor - WebMD.com
- Induction of labour. Clinical guideline, UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, June 2001.
- Josie L. Tenore: Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor. American Family Physician, 15 May 2003.
|
|||||||||||
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 19 September 2008, at 00:29.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Induction (birth)".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.