Lex loci delicti commissi

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Lex loci delicti commissi is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

Scales of justice
Conflict of laws
 
Preliminiaries
Characterisation · Incidental question
Renvoi · Choice of law
Conflict of laws in the United States
Public policy · Hague Conference
Definitional elements
State · Jurisdiction · Procedure
Forum non conveniens · Lex causae
Lex fori · Forum shopping
Lis alibi pendens
Connecting factors
Domicile · Lex domicilii
Habitual residence
Nationality · Lex patriae
Lex loci arbitri · Lex situs
Lex loci contractus
Lex loci delicti commissi
Lex loci actus
Lex loci solutionis · Proper law
Lex loci celebrationis
Choice of law clause · Dépeçage
Forum selection clause
Substantive legal areas
Status · Capacity · Contract · Tort
Marriage · Nullity
Divorce (Get · Talaq)
Property · Succession · Trusts
Enforcement
Enforcement of foreign judgments
Mareva injunctions
Anti-suit injunctions
v  d  e

The lex loci delicti commissi is the Latin term for "law of the place where the tort was committed" in the conflict of laws. Conflict is the branch of law regulating all lawsuits involving a "foreign" law element where a difference in result will occur depending on which laws are applied.

The term is often shortened to lex loci delicti.

Explanation

When a case comes before a court and all the main features of the case are local, the court will apply the lex fori, the prevailing municipal law, to decide the case. But if there are "foreign" elements to the case, the forum court may be obliged under the Conflict of Laws system to consider:

  • whether the forum court has jurisdiction to hear the case (see the problem of forum shopping);
  • it must then characterise the issues, i.e. allocate the factual basis of the case to its relevant legal classes; and
  • then apply the choice of law rules to decide the lex causae, i.e. which law is to be applied to each class of issue or to the case as a whole.

The lex loci delicti commissi is one of the possible choice of law rules applied to cases arising from an alleged tort. For example, suppose that a person domiciled in Australia and a person habitually resident in Albania, exchange correspondence by e-mail that is alleged to defame a group of Kurds resident in Turkey. The possibly relevant choice of law rules would be:

  • the lex loci solutionis might be the most relevant but this might be difficult because three laws might equally apply, i.e. the parties themselves corresponded from two states but the damage was not sustained until the correspondence was published in Turkey;
  • the proper law which is the law which has the closest connection with the substance of the wrong alleged to have been committed; and
  • the lex fori which might have public policy issues if, say, one of the parties was an infant or there was the possibility of multiple jurisdictions having involvement over a world-wide internet issue.

See also

Wikipedia content modification information:

  • This page was last modified on 28 September 2008, at 22:12.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Lex loci delicti commissi".

The URL for this specific entry is:

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.