This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Quarks is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
In physics, a quark (IPA: /kwɔrk/, IPA: /kwɑːk/ or IPA: /kwɑːrk/) is a type of subatomic particle.[1] Quarks are elementary fermionic particles which strongly interact due to their color charge.[2] Due to the phenomenon of color confinement, quarks are never found on their own: they are always bound together in composite particles named hadrons.[3] The most common hadrons are the proton and the neutron, which are the components of atomic nuclei.
There are six different types of quarks, known as flavors: up (symbol: u), down (d), charm (c), strange (s), top (t), and bottom (b).[4] The lightest flavors, the up quark and the down quark, are generally stable and are very common in the universe as they are the constituents of protons and neutrons. The more massive charm, strange, top and bottom quarks are unstable and rapidly decay; these can only be produced as quark-pairs under high energy conditions, such as in particle accelerators and in cosmic rays. For every quark flavor there is a corresponding antiparticle, called antiquark, that differs from the quark only in that some of its properties have the opposite sign.
The quark model was independently proposed by physicists Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig in 1964.[5] There was little evidence for the theory until 1968, when electron-proton scattering experiments indicated the existence of substructure within the proton resembling three 'sphere-like' regions within the proton.[6][7] By 1995, when the top quark was observed at Fermilab, all the six flavors had been observed. Since quarks are not found in isolation, their properties can only be deduced from experiments on hadrons.[3] An exception to this rule is the top quark, which decays so rapidly that it does not produce hadrons at all, and instead is observed through the identification of the particles it has decayed into.[8] Furthermore, it has been theorized in some of the Big Bang theories, that in the very beginning, our extremely hot universe may have contained single quarks, including "free" top quarks, in a quark-gluon plasma.
Contents |
History
The quark theory was first postulated by physicists Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig in 1964.[5] At the time of the theory's initial proposal, the "particle zoo" consisted of several leptons and many different hadrons. Gell-Mann and Zweig developed the quark theory to explain the hadrons; they proposed that various combinations of quarks and antiquarks were the components of the hadrons, which were at the time considered to be indivisible.[9]
The Gell-Mann–Zweig model predicted three quarks, which they named up, down and strange. At the time, the pair of physicists ascribed various properties and values to the three new proposed particles, such as electric charge and spin.[10] The initial reaction of the physics community to the proposal was mixed, many having reservations regarding the actual physicality of the quark concept. They believed the quark was merely an abstract concept that could be used temporarily to help explain certain concepts that were not well understood, rather than an actual entity that existed in the way that Gell-Mann and Zweig had envisioned.[9]
In less than a year, extensions to the Gell-Mann–Zweig model were proposed when another duo of physicists, Sheldon Lee Glashow and James Bjorken, predicted the existence of a fourth flavor of quark, which they referred to as charm. The addition was proposed because it expanded the power and self consistency of the theory: it allowed a better description of the weak interaction (the mechanism that allows quarks to decay); equalized the number of quarks with the number of known leptons; and implied a mass formula that correctly reproduced the masses of the known mesons.[11]
In 1968, deep inelastic scattering experiments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center showed that the proton had substructure.[12][6][7] However, whilst the concept of hadron substructure had been proven, there was still apprehension towards the quark model: the substructures became known at the time as partons (a term proposed by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman, and supported by some experimental project reports[13][14]), but it "was unfashionable to identify them explicitly with quarks".[15] These partons were laterwhen? identified as up and down quarks.[16] Their discovery also validated the existence of a third strange quark, because it was necessary to the model Gell-Mann and Zweig had proposed.[17]
In a 1970 paper,[18] Glashow, John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani gave more compelling theoretical arguments for the as-yet undiscovered charm quark.[19] The number of proposed quark flavors grew to the current six in 1973, when Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa noted that the experimental observation of CP violation could be explained if there were another pair of quarks. They named the two additional quarks top and bottom.[10]
It was the observation of the charm quark that finally convinced the physics community of the quark model's correctness.[15] Following a decade without empirical evidence supporting the flavor's existence, it was created and observed almost simultaneously by two teams in November 1974: one at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center under Samuel Ting and one at Brookhaven National Laboratory under Burton Richter. The two parties had assigned the discovered particle two different names, J and ψ. The particle hence became formally known as the J/ψ meson and it was considered a quark–antiquark pair of the charm flavor that Glashow and Bjorken had predicted, or the charmonium.[9]
In 1977, the bottom quark was observed by Leon Lederman and a team at Fermilab.[5] This indicated that a top quark probably existed, because the bottom quark was without a partner. However, it was not until eighteen years later, in 1995, that the top quark was finally observed. The top quark's discovery was quite significant, because it proved to be far more massive than expected, almost as heavy as a gold atom. Reasons for the top quark's extremely large mass remain unclear.[20]
Etymology
Gell-Mann originally named the quark after the sound ducks make.[21] For some time, Gell-Mann was undecided on an actual spelling for the term he had coined, until he found the word quark in James Joyce's book Finnegans Wake:
Three quarks for Muster Mark!
Sure he has not got much of a bark
And sure any he has it's all beside the mark.—James Joyce, Finnegans Wake
Gell-Mann went into further detail regarding the name of the quark in his book, The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex, saying that the pronunciation for quark had been derived from quart, which fitted perfectly with the three-quark theory in that one might have "three quarts of drinks at a bar."[22] George Zweig, the co-proposer of the theory, preferred the name ace for the particle he had theorized, but Gell-Mann's terminology came to prominence once the quark model had been commonly accepted.[23]
Classification
The Standard Model, the theoretical framework describing all the currently known elementary particles (plus the as-yet-unobserved Higgs boson), comprises six flavors of quarks.[24] (In this context, the term flavor simply refers to different types of particles, and is unrelated with the everyday concept of flavors of food.[25]) The six flavors of quarks are named up, down, charm, strange, top and bottom; the top and bottom flavors are also known as truth and beauty, respectively.[3] Any two quarks of the same flavor are identical particles, meaning that all of their properties are the same.
In the Standard Model, particles of matter, including quarks, are classified as fermions, meaning that their spin is half-integer; as a consequence, they are subject to the Pauli exclusion principle, stating that no two fermions of the same flavor can ever simultaneously occupy the same state. This contrasts with particles mediating forces, which are bosons (that is, they have integer spin), and hence the Pauli exclusion principle does not apply to them. Among elementary fermions, quarks differ from leptons (the best-known flavor of which is the electron), in that they, unlike leptons, have a color charge causing them to engage in the weak interaction.
Elementary fermions are grouped into three generations, each one comprising two leptons and two quarks. The first generation comprises up and down quarks, the second comprises charm and strange, and the third comprises top and bottom. Particles in higher generations generally have greater mass and are less stable, tending to decay into lower-generation, less massive particles by means of the weak interaction. Typically, only the first-generation up and down quarks are in common natural occurrence; heavier quarks can only be created in high-energy conditions, such as in cosmic rays, and quickly decay. Most studies conducted on heavier quarks have been performed in artificially created conditions such as in particle accelerators. All searches for a fourth generation of quarks (or elementary fermions in general) have failed, and there is strong indirect evidence that there cannot exist more than three generations.citation needed
Antiparticles of quarks are called antiquarks (denoted by the letter for the quark with an overbar, for example u for an up antiquark). Like antimatter in general, antiquarks have the same mass and spin of their respective quarks, but the electric charge and other charges have the opposite sign.[26]
Having both electric charge, flavor, color charge and mass, quarks are the only known elementary particles engaging in all the four fundamental interactions of contemporary physics: respectively, electromagnetism, weak interaction, strong interaction and gravitation (although the last one is usually irrelevant at subatomic scales, and is not described by the Standard Model).
See the table of properties below for a more complete analysis of the six quark flavors' properties.
Properties
Hadronization
Various quark flavor combinations result in the formation of composite particles known as hadrons. There are two types of hadrons: baryons (made of three quarks) and mesons (made of a quark and an antiquark). The building blocks of the atomic nucleus—the proton and the neutron—are baryons.[25] There are a great number of known hadrons, and most of them are differentiated by their quark content and the properties that these constituent quarks confer upon them.[3]
Weak interaction
A quark of one flavor can transform into a quark of a different flavor by the weak interaction. A quark can decay into a lighter quark by emitting a W and Z bosons, or can absorb a W boson to turn into a heavier quark. This mechanism causes the radioactive process of beta decay, in which a neutron "splits" into a proton, an electron and an antineutrino. This occurs when one of the down quarks in the neutron (composed by udd) decays into an up quark by emitting a W− boson, transforming the neutron into a proton (uud). The W− boson then decays into an electron (e−) and an electron antineutrino (νe).[27]
Electric charge
A quark has a fractional electric charge value, either −1/3 or +2/3 (measured in elementary charges); correspondingly, the charge of an antiquark can be either +1/3 or −2/3. The up, charm and top quarks all have charge of +2/3, while the down, strange and bottom quarks have −1/3. The electric charge of a hadron is the sum of the charges of the constituent quarks;[28], the total is always an integer.
The electric charge of quarks is important in the construction of nuclei. The hadron constituents of the atom, the neutron and proton, have charges of 0 and +1 respectively; the neutron is composed of two down quarks and one up quark, and the proton of two up quarks and one down quark. The total electric charge of a nucleus, that is, the number of protons in it, is known as the atomic number, and it is the main difference between atoms of different chemical elements. Atoms usually have as many electrons as protons; since the electric charge of an electron is −1, the net electric charge of an atom is typically 0. An atom in which this is not the case is called an atomic ion.[29]
Spin
The term spin denotes a specific, intrinsic 'degree of freedom', or property of quantum particles which is only observed in the presence of field gradients, such as either magnetic or gravitational, and is precisely defined by its symmetry properties, as correctly specified, for example, by the Pauli matrices for spin. Spin is sometimes visualized as the rotation of an object around its own axis, but strictly speaking this description is incorrect, as elementary particles are believed to be point-like, and hence cannot rotate around themselves. Spin is measured in units of h/(2π), where h is the Planck constant. This unit is often denoted by ħ, and called the "reduced Planck constant" (or sometimes the "Dirac constant"). The component of the spin of a quark along any axis is always either ħ/2 or −ħ/2; for this reason quarks are classified as spin-1/2 particles, or fermions.[30] The deep nature of the intrinsic (quantum) symmetry property called spin is still unknown, but theoretical physicists, including Schrodinger and Dirac, have known since late 20s that the correct quantum equations including spin can only be obtained with a relativistic approach. In the case of quarks, as in the case of all fermions, one uses up arrows ↑ and down arrows ↓ for the spin eigenvalue of either +1/2 or −1/2, respectively. On the other hand, the flavor of a quark is first denoted using the first character of the flavor name, followed by either ↑ or ↓ to signify the values of +1/2 or −1/2, respectively. For example, an up quark with a positive spin of 1/2 along a given axis would be denoted u↑.[31] The quark's spin value contributes to the overall spin of the parent hadron, much as quark's electrical charge does to the overall charge of the hadron. Varying combinations of quark spins result in the total spin value that can be assigned to the hadron.[32] However, one notes, that this view has been recently challenged in quantum chromodynamics by theories that include vacuum polarization and the coupling of quark hadrons to strange quarks in the vacuum.citation needed
Color charge
In addition to the electric charge, quarks carry another type of charge called color charge. Despite its name, it is not related to colors of visible light.[33] There are three types of color charge a quark can carry, named blue, green and red; each of them is complemented by an anti-color: antiblue, antigreen and antired, respectively. While a quark can have red, green or blue charge, an antiquark can have antired, antigreen, or antiblue charge.
The system of attraction and repulsion between quarks charged with any of the three colors (called strong interaction, and described by quantum chromodynamics) is as follows: a quark charged with one color value will be attracted to an antiquark carrying the corresponding anticolor, while three quarks all charged with differing colors will similarly be forced together. In any other case, a force of repulsion will come into effect.[34] Quarks undergo such color interactions via the exchange of quantum field carrier particles known as gluons, a concept which is further discussed below.
In the process of hadronization, the role played by the three color types becomes evident. The result of two attracting quarks that form a stable quark–antiquark pair will be color neutrality: a quark with n color charge plus an antiquark of −n color charge will result in a color charge of 0, or "white". The combination of all three color charges will similarly result in the cancelling out of color charge, yielding the same "white" color charge as in the previous case of the interaction between the quark and antiquark of opposite charge colors. These two methods of color neutral hadronization are the same as the two ways in which all hadrons are formed (all hadrons must be color neutral); a meson, comprised of two particles, is the result of the binding of a quark and antiquark that have opposite color charges, whereas a baryon, containing three particles, arises from the hadronization of three quarks, all charged with different colors.[35]
Mass
There are two different terms used when describing a quark's mass; current quark mass refers to the mass of a quark by itself, while constituent quark mass refers to the current quark mass plus the mass of the gluon particle field surrounding the quark.[36] These two values are typically very different in their relative size, for several reasons.
In a hadron most of the mass comes from the gluons that bind the constituent quarks together, rather than from the individual quarks; the mass of the quarks is almost negligible compared to the mass derived from the gluons' energy. While gluons are inherently massless, they possess energy, and it is this energy that contributes so greatly to the overall mass of the hadron. This is demonstrated by a common hadron–the proton. Composed of one d and two u quarks, the proton has an overall mass of approximately 938 MeV/c2, of which the three quarks contribute around 15 MeV/c2, with the remainder coming from the quantum chromodynamics binding energy (QCBE) provided by the gluon field.[37][38] This makes direct calculations of quark masses based on quantum chromodynamics quite difficult, and often unreliable, as quantum perturbation methods (that were very successful in quantum electrodynamics) fail most of the times. Often, mass values can be derived after calculating the difference in mass between two related hadrons that have opposing or complementary quark components; for example, the proton to the neutron, where the difference between the two is one down quark to one up quark, the relative masses and the mass differences of which can then be measured by the difference in the overall mass of the two hadrons.[37]
The masses of most quarks were within predicted ranges at the time of their discovery, with the notable exception of the top quark, which was found to have a mass approximately equal to that of a gold nucleus, around 200 times heavier than the hadron it was thought to form.[39] Various theories have been offered to explain this very large mass; common predictions assert that the answer to the abnormality will be found when more is known about the top quark's interaction with the Higgs (boson) field, and how the Higgs boson field adds very heavily to the total mass, and might also bring about the very existence of mass.[20]
Table of quark properties
The following table summarizes the key properties of the six known quarks:
| Name | Symbol | Generation | Mass (MeV/c2) | Spin | Electric charge | Antiparticle | Antiparticle symbol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up | u | 1 | 1.5 to 3.3 | 1/2 | +2/3 | Antiup | u |
| Down | d | 1 | 3.5 to 6.0 | 1/2 | −1/3 | Antidown | d |
| Charm | c | 2 | 1160 to 1340 | 1/2 | +2/3 | Anticharm | c |
| Strange | s | 2 | 70 to 130 | 1/2 | −1/3 | Antistrange | s |
| Top | t | 3 | 169,100 to 173,300 | 1/2 | +2/3 | Antitop | t |
| Bottom | b | 3 | 4130 to 4370 | 1/2 | −1/3 | Antibottom | b |
Color confinement and gluons
A key phenomenon called color confinement is thought to keep quarks within a hadron. This refers to a quark's inability to escape as a single particle from its parent hadron, thereby rendering impossible the actual observation of a single quark. Color confinement applies to all quarks, except for the case of the top quark where the actual escape mechanism at extremely high energies is still uncertain. Therefore, most of what is known experimentally about quarks has been inferred indirectly from the effects they have on their parent hadron's properties.[41][42] The top quark is an exception because its lifetime is so short that it does not have a chance to hadronize.[8] One method used is comparing two hadrons that have all but one quark in common, the properties of the different quark are inferred from the difference in values between the two hadrons. Color confinement is primarily caused by interactions with the gluon color field and the gluon exchange between quarks.
Quarks have an inherent relationship with the gluon, which is technically a massless vector gauge boson. Gluons are responsible for the color field, or the strong interaction, that ensures that quarks remain bound in hadrons and causes color confinement, and are the subjects of the quantum chromodynamics research area.[43] Gluons, roughly speaking, carry both a color charge and an anti-color charge, for example red–antiblue.[44][45]
Gluons are constantly exchanged between quarks through a "virtual" emission and re-absorption process. These gluon exchange events between quarks are extremely frequent, occurring approximately 1024 times every second.[46] When a gluon is transferred between one quark and another, a color change occurs in the receiving and emitting quark;[37][47] for example, if a red quark emits a red–antigreen gluon, it becomes green, and if a green quark absorbs it, it becomes red. These constant switches in color within quarks are mediated by the gluons in such a way that a bound hadron will constantly retain a dynamic and ever-changing set of color types that will preserve the force of attraction, therefore forever disallowing quarks to exist in isolation.[48]
The color field, that the gluon is a carrier of, contributes most significantly to a hadron's indivisibility into single quarks, or color confinement. This is demonstrated by the varying strength of the chromodynamic binding force between the constituent quarks of a hadron; as quarks come closer to each other, the chromodynamic binding force actually weakens (this is called asymptotic freedom), but while they drift further apart, the strength of the bind dramatically increases. This is because as the color field is stressed by the drifting away of a quark, much as an elastic band is stressed when pulled apart, a proportionate and necessary multitude of gluons of appropriate color property are created to strengthen the stretched field. In this way, an infinite amount of energy would be required to wrench a quark from its hadronized state.[49]
These strong interactions are highly non-linear, because gluons can emit gluons and exchange gluons with other gluons. This property has led to a postulate regarding the possible existence of a particle that is purely made of gluons (a glueball), despite previous observations indicating that gluons cannot exist without the 'attached' quarks, and also in violation of the de Broglie quantum mechanism as applied to gluon color fields, because the "pure particles" called glueballs would be then the only known exception to the wave-particle duality, or de Broglie model, which is known to be applicable to all other known quantum particles.clarify The glueball postulate thus also amounts to denying the existence of gluon color fields and of the color confinement mechanism discussed above.[50]
Sea quarks
The quarks that make up the so-calledcitation needed "core", or valence quarks of any hadron that are "floating" in a "sea" of other much less stable quarks—by a somewhat incorrect analogy with the structure of the atom (because the term core does not at all describe a "zone near the geometric center" of the hadron, as it did in the case of the atom). Such valence quarks are generally stable, and are the quarks that contribute to the quantum numbers of the hadrons. However, from the gluons' strong interaction field there are also born short-lived, virtual quark–antiquark (qq) pairs, known as sea quarks. Such sea quarks are much less stable, and they annihilate each other very quickly within the interior of the hadron. They are thought to be born from the splitting of a gluon, and thus when a sea quark is annihilated, new gluons are produced.[51] There is a constant quantum flux of sea quarks that are born from the vacuum, and this allows for a constant cycle of gluon splits and rebirths. This flux is colloquially known as "the sea".[52]
References
- ^ "Fundamental Particles". Oxford Physics. Retrieved on 2008-06-29.
- ^ "Quark (subatomic particle)". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved on 2008-06-29.
- ^ a b c d Q. Ho-Kim, X.-Y. Phạm (1998). Elementary Particles and Their Interactions: Concepts and Phenomena. Springer, p.169. ISBN 3540636676.
- ^ "Quarks". HyperPhysics. Retrieved on 2008-06-29.
- ^ a b c B. Carithers, P. Grannis. "Discovery of the Top Quark". Retrieved on 2008-09-23.
- ^ a b E. D. Bloom (1969). "High-Energy Inelastic e-p Scattering at 6° and 10°". Physical Review Letters 23: p.930. doi:.
- ^ a b M. Breidenbach (1969). "Observed Behavior of Highly Inelastic Electron-Proton Scattering". Physical Review Letters 23: p.935. doi:.
- ^ a b F. Garberson (2008). "Top Quark Mass and Cross Section Results from the Tevatron" in Hadron Collider Physics Symposium (HCP2008), Galena, Illinois, USA..
- ^ a b c K.W. Staley (2004). The Evidence for the Top Quark. Cambridge University Press, p.15. ISBN 0521827108.
- ^ a b "Funny Quarks". CERN. Retrieved on 2008-09-24.
- ^ B. J. Bjorken, S. L. Glashow (1964). "Elementary Particles and SU(4)". Physics Letters 11: p.255. doi:.
- ^ J.I. Friedman. "The Road to the Nobel Prize". Hue University. Retrieved on 2008-09-29.
- ^ Richard P. Feynman, Proceedings of the 3rd Topical Conference on High Energy Collision of Hadrons, Stony Brook, N. Y. (1969)
- ^ CTEQ Collaboration, S. Kretzer et al., "CTEQ6 Parton Distributions with Heavy Quark Mass Effects", Phys. Rev. D69, 114005 (2004).
- ^ a b D. J. Griffiths (1987). Introduction to Elementary Particles. John Wiley & Sons, p.42. ISBN 0-471-60386-4.
- ^ L. M. Lederman, D. Teresi (2006). The God Particle. Mariner Books, p.208. ISBN 0618711686.
- ^ Schombert, James. "Short History of Particles". University of Oregon. Retrieved on 5 October 2008.
- ^ S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, L. Maiani (1970). "Weak Interactions with Lepton-Hadron Symmetry". Physical Review D 2: 1285. doi:. Retrieved on 2008-09-29.
- ^ D. J. Griffiths (1987). Introduction to Elementary Particles. John Wiley & Sons, p.44. ISBN 0-471-60386-4.
- ^ a b "New Precision Measurement of Top Quark Mass". Brookhaven National Laboratory News. Retrieved on 2008-09-24.
- ^ J. Gribbin, M. Gribbin (1997). Richard Feynman: A Life in Science. Penguin Books, p.194. ISBN ISBN 0-452-27631-4.
- ^ M. Gell-Mann (1995). The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. Owl Books, p.180. ISBN 978-0805072532.
- ^ Gleick, J. (1992). Richard Feynman and modern physics. Little Brown and Company, 390. ISBN 0-316-903167.
- ^ K. W. Ford (2005). The Quantum World. Harvard University Press, p.169. ISBN 067401832X.
- ^ a b M. Munowitz (2005). Knowing. Oxford University Press (US), p.35. ISBN 0195167376.
- ^ P. Rowlands (2008). Zero to Infinity. World Scientific, p.406. ISBN 9812709142.
- ^ "Weak Interactions". Virtual Visitor Center. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (2008). Retrieved on 2008-09-28.
- ^ B. Povh, K. Rith, C. Scholz, F. Zetsche, M. Lavelle (2004). Particles and Nuclei. Springer. ISBN 3540201688. OCLC 53001447.
- ^ W. Demtröder (2002). Atoms, Molecules and Photons: An Introduction to Atomic- Molecular- and Quantum Physics, 1st Edition, Springer, 39–42. ISBN 3540206310.
- ^ F. Close (2006). The New Cosmic Onion. CRC Press, p.82. ISBN 1584887982.
- ^ D. Lincoln (2004). Understanding the Universe. World Scientific, p.116. ISBN 9812387056.
- ^ "Quarks". Antonine Education. Retrieved on 2008-07-10.
- ^ B. Gal-Or (1983). Cosmology, Physics, and Philosophy. Springer, p.276. ISBN 0387905812.
- ^ J. S. Trefil, G. Walters (2004). The Moment of Creation. Courier Dover Publications, p.112. ISBN 0486438139.
- ^ B. A. Schumm (2004). Deep Down Things. JHU Press, p.131–132. ISBN 080187971X. OCLC 55229065.
- ^ A. Watson (2004). The Quantum Quark. Cambridge University Press, p.286. ISBN 0521829070.
- ^ a b c M. Veltman (2003). Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics. World Scientific, p.46. ISBN 981238149X.
- ^ W. Weise, A. M. Green (1984). Quarks and Nuclei. World Scientific, p.65. ISBN 9971966611.
- ^ F. Canelli. "The Top Quark: Worth its Weight in Gold". University of Rochester. Retrieved on 2008-10-24.
- ^ C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), PL B667, 1 (2008) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov/2008/tables/rpp2008-sum-quarks.pdf)
- ^ T. Wu, W.-Y. Pauchy Hwang (1991). Relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum fields. World Science, p. 321. ISBN 9810206089.
- ^ D. Papenfuss, D. Lüst, W. Schleich (2002). 100 Years Werner Heisenberg: Works and Impact. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 3527403922. OCLC 50694495.
- ^ P. Renton (1988). Electroweak Interactions. Cambridge University Press, 332. ISBN 0521366925.
- ^ C. Grupen, G. Cowan, S. D. Eidelman, T. Stroh (2005). Astroparticle Physics. Springer, p.26. ISBN 3540253122.
- ^ J. Bottomley, J. Baez (1996). "Why are there eight gluons and not nine?". Usenet Physics FAQ. Retrieved on 2008-09-28.
- ^ J. A. Jungerman (2000). World in Process. SUNY Press, p.107. ISBN 0791447499.
- ^ F. Wilczek, B. Devine (2006). Fantastic Realities. World Scientific, p.85. ISBN 981256649X.
- ^ S. Webb (2004). Out of this World. Springer, p.91. ISBN 0387029303.
- ^ T.Yulsman (2002). Origin. CRC Press, 55. ISBN 075030765X.
- ^ J. T. V Tran (1996). '96 Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories. Atlantica Séguier Frontières, p.60. ISBN 2863322052.
- ^ J. Steinberger (2005). Learning about Particles. Springer, p.130. ISBN 3540213295.
- ^ National Research Council (U.S.). Elementary-Particle Physics Panel (1986). Elementary-particle Physics. National Academies Press, 62. ISBN 0309035767.
Further reading
- D. J. Griffiths (1987). Introduction to Elementary Particles. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-60386-4.
- A. Pickering (1984). Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-66799-5.
- B. Povh (1995). Particles and Nuclei: An Introduction to the Physical Concepts. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-59439-6.
External links
- A Positron Named Priscilla – A description of CERN’s experiment to count the families of quarks.
- An elementary popular introduction
- Quark dance
- The original English word quark and its adaptation to particle physics
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 16 October 2008, at 00:18.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Quarks".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
