This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Royal Commission on the Defence of the United Kingdom is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
In 1859 Lord Palmerston instigated the Royal Commission on the Defence of the United Kingdom because of serious concerns that France might attempt to invade the UK. The recent period had seen great improvements in gunnery (with RML and RBL designs); the widespread introduction of steam propulsion in ships (the French La Gloire and British response HMS Warrior are examples); and the growth of the French battle fleet (between 1854-1858 it had achieved numerical equality to the British). These factors convinced him that Britain's coastal defences were inadequate to prevent invasion by Napoleon III if the Royal Navy were lured elsewhere.
The Commission consisted of six eminent naval and military officers, plus a civilian representative of the Treasury, James Fergusson, who in 1856-57had published papers warning of the vulnerability of Portsmouth. Its brief was to enquire into the state and sufficiency of fortifications existing and planned for defending the UK, with a specific focus on naval dockyards.
They concluded in their report in February 1860 that the fleet, standing army and volunteer forces, even combined, did not provide sufficient defence. An intensive program of fortification was begun. The Commission recommended that only vital points be fortified, and these were considered to be the Royal Dockyards at Portsmouth, Chatham, Plymouth, Portland Harbour, Milford Haven and elsewhere. These forts became known as the Palmerston Forts. Portsmouth harbour, in particular, was given a new encircling line of forts to protect it from landward and seaward attack.
Queen Victoria supported the scheme. Its chief opponent was William Gladstone, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, who resigned in protest when it was accepted.
By the time the fortifications were completed in the 1880s it was clear that the French had not seriously planned to invade, and the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–71 removed the threat. Palmerston was widely criticised, and these forts are often called Palmerston's Follies. As a key purpose of fortification is deterrent, this judgement was harsh, but with the rapid development of warship design during the period, the time taken to plan and implement the works would always have caused problems with ensuring that the defences were capable of defeating a French attack force.
See also
References
- Fort Brockhurst and the Gomer-Elson Forts, David Moore, Solent Papers No. 6, pub. David Moore, 1990, ISBN 0951323431
External links
- Royal Engineers Museum Coastal Defence
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 11 July 2008, at 03:36.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Royal Commission on the Defence of the United Kingdom".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.