Welcome to the MedLibrary.org Wikipedia Supplement on Talk:Atheism in Hinduism -- Please Click to Return to Front Page

WikiProject Atheism     (Rated Start-Class)
	Atheism in Hinduism is part of WikiProject Atheism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide atheism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
For more information and how you can help click Show → If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. Quick help: Main talk page Article layout Links to Atheism information and Wikipedia:Research resources Writing about religion and Article development Citing sources, Verifing Sources and Original research Assume good faith and be civil See changes to: Core articles Atheism article New atheism articles To Do List: - history - watch - purge Join WikiProject atheism and be bold Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members Help with articles. See this month's adopt an article. Help out with the To-do lists Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for atheism related articles (see: atheism layout style, The perfect article, and Featured articles) Add Atheism navigation template on the bottom of all atheism articles; (use {{Atheism}} or see navigation template) Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box) Add {{Category:atheism}} to the bottom of all atheism related articles, so it shows up on the list of atheism articles Maintenance / Etc Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources, and atheism references). Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process) Watch the list of atheism related articles and add to accordingly (see atheism articles) And always write for an encyclopedia. Article to improve for the month of November Agnosticism Create Notable atheist articles Shorten / merge into others Expand an atheism stub Your immediate attention false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Atheism, using footnotes.

This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Contents 1 What? 2 Title 3 'naastika' doesn't mean atheist 4 Some people! 5 Yoga section 6 Bal Thakeray the atheist? 7 madhav acharya as avatar 8 Materialism/Charvaka 9 Title does not make sense 9.1 Athism in India 10 Separate Atheism in Buddhism page? 11 Prominent Atheists- Useless section

What?

What is this article supposed to be about? It consists of "Astika", and other unrelated matter. If you could name it "Nidish Singhal, an atheist, but a Hindu", it would be more apt. :) ^Babub→Talk 15:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Astika just meant belief in doctrine of vedas and not in the beleif of existence of creationist God. Samkhya and purva Mimamsa were very clear in this respect. Even if you reject Nastika school of thoughts out of hinduism, you will have to accept that Shat Astik darshan had atheistic views.--nids(♂) 15:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Do you think this needs a new article? I fell this has to be merged or deleted. All this is anyway covered in Hindu philosophy. But, perhaps you could do something with the Indian philosophy article? ^Babub→Talk 15:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Definately not. But i found a stiff resistance, when i tried to include even a atheist can be a hindu in the Hinduism and related article.--nids(♂) 15:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

But i think as of now, this article has enough ammo to stand on its own and a deletion would not be required. I would humbly request you to support the inclusion of even a atheist can be a hindu in hinduism article and redirect here for details.--nids(♂) 15:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Indian philosophy deals with some of the philosophies which are obviously not Hindu, under any definition. Like Ahmadi or Sufi movement. While Lokayakta is included in Hindu philosophies under many definitions. (Unorthodox and Nastika)--nids(♂) 15:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Title

If "noone" has problems with the title, I'm going to withdraw the AfD nom. ^Babub→Talk 03:11, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

'naastika' doesn't mean atheist

Naastika means veda-rejecting hindu traditions; while aastika means veda-adhering hindu traditions.

Schools based on purva mimaamsa and sankhya philosophy were atheistic; yet adhered to vedas.

Atheistic aastika traditions: samkhya; yoga(partly); mimaamsa Theistic naastika traditions: sikhism; veersaivism/lingayaatism; ayyavazhism

Hope this helps in cleaning up this section Leafy 22:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

As for references or such - first off i think this section needs a clean up... Leafy 22:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Yup. I know that. and that is what is precisely written in this article.nids(♂) 22:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

You would also like to refer to the Afd filed for the article. some users were contesting that Mimamsaks were theistic. I know they are atheistic, but it would be nice if you can arrange for some better references. Thank you.nids(♂) 22:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I'll try; but spare me some time. Leafy 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Ofcourse. Do whenever you get time. nids(♂) 08:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Nids, you have not mentioned Vaisesika along with the other darshanas, though it got currupted later, the original thought did not require a creationist God, yet it was astik. It should be clearly understood here that we are Astika (believing in the wisdom of Vedas) Nireeshwarvadis and not secular atheists. Aupmanyav 15:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Aupmanyav, i just have a basic knowledge about the astika darshans. So basically, I have just written a stub. I dont know if Vaisesika was atheistic, but please add it if you are sure about the info. I dont think anyone would fight here to produce a source for it, but it'd be great if you can procure one. Thnx. nids(♂) 17:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Some people!

Some morons think being polytheistic or henotheistic or deistic or mahahajhdhdhdjhssktheistic is the same as being atheistic. Nothing I can do to help them . ^Babub→Talk 05:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Its not really your prob if you fail to understand what atheism means in the first place. Leafy 12:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I understand it very well: Belief in the non-existence of god(s). ^Babub→Talk 13:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Its disbelief in existence of a god i.e, absolute god/s. Mimamsa's devaas aren't gods - they're positions that one ascends to through karma according to my poor memory. Leafy 17:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Babub, why are you distorting facts and changing Hindu to Indian philosophy everywhere. Tomorrow, you will say that Lingayats are not Hindus.nids(♂) 14:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Maybe, you would like to work on Indian philosophy section and even expand Ahmadi and Sufi parts.nids(♂) 14:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Leafy, all Darshanas did require no Gods, and Advaita is not Sankara's theory. There is pre-Sankara advaita also. There are numerous instances when upanishads accept that there is nothing other than 'Brahman', and worship of Gods is erroronous; that leaves no space for a creationist God. Aupmanyav 15:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Yoga section

Since i dont have the requisite knowledge on the subject, i request other editors to introduce the section of Atheism as present in Yoga philosophy.nids(♂) 10:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Bal Thakeray the atheist?

I know that this is a good debating point, but it doesn't make sense to call him an atheist because of an outburst like that. My granny "turned atheist" after one of my uncles drowned in the temple tank. She stayed away from Him for 15 days and then apparently God called her back. It does not make sense to include people who just happen to be angry at God because of their misfortunes among those who adopt atheism as a philosophical position. — Ravikiran 11:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Should this be removed. I dont think he said because he was angry. Many of the swayamsevaks are atheists too.nids(♂) 11:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I went through the JSTOR article, and it only indirectly references an editorial in Saamna, I quote: `According to one report that cites an editorial by Thackeray in Saamna, Thackeray has declared himself an atheist'. I hardly think this is sufficient evidence to cite Thackeray as an atheist, especially considering his other Hindutva related activities. I am removing his name from the article. Shanth phy (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

madhav acharya as avatar

i have removed

Madhava Acharya himself was one of the founding fathers of the Hindu Empire of Vijayanagar, fought against Islamic domination and proclaimed himself as an avatara of Vishnu.

and other unsourced additions to the article.nids(♂) 09:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Materialism/Charvaka

Materialism has been around in India for at least 2600 years and deserves special mention in this article. The Charvakas were well known and prominent enough to deserve a mention in a number of popular texts. Other than Charvakas, we also had people like Ajita Keshakambalin who denied the existence of soul, rebirth, etc., but unlike the Charvakas did not recommend losing moral values.

Shvushvu 16:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

You are free to add anything in the article. Just remember that we have a separate article on Charvaka, and this article should just be a synopsis on the different atheistic viewpoints present in the Hinduism. You can o'course expand the main charvaka article anytime. Thanks.nids(♂) 17:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I've added Ajita Kesakambali to the See Also section until he can be more tightly integrated into the article. — coelacan talk — 19:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Title does not make sense

By definition Hinduism is a theistic religion. There is no such thing as Atheism in Islam, or Atheism in Christianity. Rightfully so, because, there can not be atheism within in a religion. It is nonsense. The tile should be changed to Atheism in Indian Though, or Atheism in Indian philosophy. --Natkeeran (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

sure, makes no sense. Title should be changed to Atheism in India. Docku: What up? 22:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Hinduism is usually thought about to be a theistic religion. Hinduism is a diverse system of thought with beliefs spanning monotheism, polytheism,panentheism, pantheism, monism and atheism. Deavenger (talk) 23:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Athism in India

There can be many diverse viewpoints or systems of thoughts within a religion, just as in Christianity. But one can not say that religion argues for irreligion. Atheism in India is a more appropriate title. --Natkeeran (talk) 15:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Agree, it is just confusing. Atheism in India is rather broader and general in scope and "Atheism in Hinduism" can be included as a sub-section. Docku: What up? 15:32, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

The premise that "Hinduism is by definition theistic" is highly dubious, as the article itself already establishes. Astika implies "belief in the Vedas", which doesn't amount to theism at all, but involves mysticist notions that are very far removed from anything resembling theism. This is a topic of Hindu philosophy. "Atheism in India" would be one of demographics (how many percent of Indians self-idenfity as atheists). That's a completely different issue. Out of six darshanas, only Vedanta strikes me as unambiguously theistic. Of course, Vedanta practically amounts to "Hinduism" today, but unlike what many Hindus would have you believe, Hinduism does in fact have a history, and a thousand years ago, the distribution of philosophical mainstream within Hinduism looked rather different from today. "Hinduism is by definition theistic" is a bit like saying "Christianity is by definition Trinitarian": it is a wrong use of "by definition" instead of "de facto (with marginal exceptions)". The meaning of "de facto" is actually the very opposite of that of "by definition". --dab (𒁳) 17:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

complex and useful. My take is we create a new article Atheism in India. Docku: What up? 18:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Given the current content of this article, Atheism in India would be a better title -- I agree with a move. But, Atheism in Hinduism is also a worthy topic (just like Christian atheism).

@Natkeeran -- Like dab says, Hinduism is not a theistic religion by definition. In fact, whether it's a "religion" in the familiar Western sense is also debatable (many of its adherents proclaim that it's a "way of life"). Hinduism has no known founder or no formal organization structure. So, there is no authority to dictate whether a Hindu should believe in God or not. Many people (e.g. Hindu nationalist Veer Savarkar) call themselves " atheist" and "Hindu" at the same time: http://books.google.com/books?q=savarkar+atheist

That said, I feel that the current content of this article is better suited under the title "Atheism in India". Or if you want to expand its scope, it can be located at Irreligion in India, on the lines of Irreligion in the United States. You can leave some content under Atheism in Hinduism, but obviously, the discussion about Jainism and other Nastika philosophies should be located at Atheism in India. Similarly, Periyar E. V. Ramasamy was not a "Hindu atheist" -- he recommended Islam to his followers. All these things should be moved out of this article.

utcursch | talk 02:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Periyar was born a Hindu, voraciously read Hindu texts, re-interpretted, quite controversially, Ramayana, was strongly against the social heirarchy in Hindu religion. He believed in no God, but for people who wanted to follow a religion he recommended Islam which he believed was more socially egalitarian. It is going to be difficult to categorise him either way. Docku: What up? 13:46, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Separate Atheism in Buddhism page?

I note the absence of an "Atheism in Buddhism" page --both are, doubtless, necessary.

The Pali Canon contains quite a lot of our evidence for atheistic schools of thought among ancient "Hindus" (a problematic term, as everyone knows) --viz., evidence that orthodox (Hindu) sources are not prone to record. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.52.148.34 (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Prominent Atheists- Useless section

The section on "Prominent Atheists" adds no value to the article. It needs to be deleted sandy (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

i seem to agree with you. It seems to fit well in Atheism in India, which has such a list already. --Docku: What's up? 17:33, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia content modification information:

• This page was last modified on 26 December 2008, at 17:33.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Talk:Atheism in Hinduism".

The URL for this specific entry is:

• http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Talk:Atheism_in_Hinduism

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.