This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Template:Disputed-section is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
| The factual accuracy of this section is disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page. |
This template identifies a Wikipedia article where one or more sections has content whose accuracy or factual nature is in dispute.
- This template is a self-reference.
- Please do not subst: this template.
Usage
First add a new section to the article's talk page outlining your concerns, then add {{Disputed-section}} to the top of the disputed section in the main article. To include a link from the "disputed section" header to the proper section of the talk page, use {{Disputed-section|talk page section name}}. Articles using this template as shown above are placed into Category:Accuracy disputes.
This template can take an optional date parameter in the format {{Disputed-section|date = <month> <year>}} or {{Disputed-section|talk page section name|date = <month> <year>}}. If the date is not included it will probably be added later by a WP:BOT. Articles using this template with a date are added to Category:Accuracy disputes from <month> <year>.
Example using current date
Template:
-
- {{Disputed-section}}
Output:
| The factual accuracy of this section is disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.(December 2008) |
Category:
Redirects
- {{Accuracy-section}}
- {{Disputed-sect}}
- {{Disputedsection}}
- {{Section-disputed}}
- {{SectDisputed}}
- {{Sectfact}}
See also
Wikipedia project pages
- Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
- Wikipedia:Consensus
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
- Wikipedia:Disputed statement
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Template messages
- Wikipedia:Template namespace
a structure, position ect. larger, heavier ect. than the other side
Templates
Disputed
- Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} Article, {{Disputed-section}} Section
- {{Underdiscussion}} For use on project pages (e.g. policies and guidelines), not on articles
- {{Disputedtag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- Inline:
- {{Dubious}} Statement
- {{List fact}} Single list entry
- {{Underdiscussion-inline}} Statements on project pages
- See also Category:Dispute templates
POV
- Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article, {{POV-section}} Section, {{POV-intro}} Lead section
- {{POV-check}} Article, {{POV-check-section}} Section
- Inline:
- {{POV-statement}} Statement
- {{POV-assertion}} Statement
- {{Lopsided}} Statement
- See also Category:Neutrality templates
Both disputed and POV
- Boxes:
- {{Totally-disputed}} Article, {{Totally-disputed-section}} Section, {{Totally-disputed-lead}} Lead section
- {{Controversial}} Talk page
Wiki
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 11 March 2008, at 22:34.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Template:Disputed-section".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
