This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Template:DisputedAssertion is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
 |
This high-risk template has been protected from editing to prevent vandalism. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. Please discuss any changes on the talk page; you may use the {{editprotected}} template to ask an administrator to make the edit if it is supported by consensus. You may also request that this page be unprotected. |
Contents |
Usage
Add {{dubious}} after a specific statement or alleged fact that is subject to dispute (your own or someone else's); for an entire disputed article or section, see {{Disputed}} and {{Disputed-section}}. It is best to simultaneously try to resolve the dispute on the talk page. To refer to a specific talk page section, use {{Dubious|talk page section name}}; if the dispute does not have a talk page section yet (e.g. because it has been argued in edit summaries), please create one.
This template is not for flagging items that an editor simply thinks might be incorrect or unsourced (this is what {{fact}} is for). It is for tagging statements that are subject to ongoing dispute among editors, e.g. due to conflicting sources or doubts about sources' reliability. The purposes of this template are:
- To warn readers that a statement in the article may not be accurate
- To alert editors that additional sources need to be found, to ascertain which of the conflicting views in the dispute is more authoritative
Do not add this template to a page more than a reasonable number of times. Please consider using one of the other templates mentioned below instead.
See also
Wikipedia project pages
- Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
- Wikipedia:Consensus
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
- Wikipedia:Disputed statement
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Template messages
- Wikipedia:Template namespace
a structure, position ect. larger, heavier ect. than the other side
Templates
Disputed
- Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} Article, {{Disputed-section}} Section
- {{Underdiscussion}} For use on project pages (e.g. policies and guidelines), not on articles
- {{Disputedtag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- Inline:
- {{Dubious}} Statement
- {{List fact}} Single list entry
- {{Underdiscussion-inline}} Statements on project pages
- See also Category:Dispute templates
POV
- Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article, {{POV-section}} Section, {{POV-intro}} Lead section
- {{POV-check}} Article, {{POV-check-section}} Section
- Inline:
- {{POV-statement}} Statement
- {{POV-assertion}} Statement
- {{Lopsided}} Statement
- See also Category:Neutrality templates
Both disputed and POV
- Boxes:
- {{Totally-disputed}} Article, {{Totally-disputed-section}} Section, {{Totally-disputed-lead}} Lead section
- {{Controversial}} Talk page
Wiki
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 18 July 2008, at 18:41.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Template:DisputedAssertion".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.