Welcome to the MedLibrary.org Wikipedia Supplement on Wikipedia:Requested moves -- Please Click to Return to Front Page

Administrator instructions

This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators. Please remove this notice when the backlog is cleared.

Contents 1 Processes beyond the scope of this page 2 Requesting uncontroversial moves 3 Requesting potentially controversial moves 3.1 Moving several pages at once 4 Uncontroversial proposals 5 Incomplete and contested proposals 6 Other proposals 6.1 14 October 2008 6.2 13 October 2008 6.3 12 October 2008 6.4 11 October 2008 6.5 10 October 2008 6.6 9 October 2008 6.7 Backlog

Shortcut: WP:RM

Requested moves is a place for requesting the retitling of an article, a template, or a page in the Wikipedia namespace. Any logged-in user who has been registered for more than four days and has made at least ten edits can use the [move] tab located at the top of each page to perform simple moves (see Help:Moving a page). However, administrator help is required if the desired title is already occupied by a redirect with a page history of more than one edit (most common), if the redirect target has a single edit but is pointing to a different page than the article sought to be moved, if the desired title matches an entry on the title blacklist, or if the page is fully protected.

In some situations, the value of a move may be under dispute, and discussion is necessary in order to reach a consensus. There is no obligation to list such move requests here; discussions of page moves can always be carried out at the article's talk page without adding an entry. This page may be seen as a place to advertise move debates that would benefit from wider community input, or for users to request assistance from administrators in moving pages.

Most move requests are processed by a handful of RM regulars who are familiar with naming conventions, nonbinding precedents, and page moving procedures. Requests are generally processed after five days, although backlogs of a few days develop occasionally. If there is a clear consensus after this time, the request will be closed and acted upon. If not, the administrator may choose to re-list the request to allow time for consensus to develop, or close it as "no consensus".

Processes beyond the scope of this page

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

To rename an image, upload the image again, but with the name you want. Then change the relevant links to reflect the new name and list the old image at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion.

To rename a category, propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.

To rename a stub template, propose the move at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion.

To merge two articles, make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers or be bold and do it yourself.

To request that page histories be merged, list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen.

Requesting uncontroversial moves

If the move you are suggesting is uncontroversial and technically possible, please feel free to move the page yourself. Moves are possible (for registered users with accounts over four days old) when the desired name is a red link, or in cases where the target is a simple redirect—a redirect to the current title, with no prior versions in its edit history. After moving a page, update its text to reflect the new title.

If there has been any past debate about the best title for the page, or if the page has recently been moved in good faith, or if anyone could honestly disagree with the move, then treat it as controversial. Otherwise, post your request in the Uncontroversial proposals section of this page.

If the only obstacle to an uncontroversial move is a navigation aid (e.g. a redirect or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history), the template {{db-move}} can be used instead to have that page deleted under criterion for speedy deletion G6.

Requesting potentially controversial moves

Please follow all three steps listed below when requesting a move.

Step 1 — Add move template to talk page

Enter {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article, or add {{moveoptions}} if you are unsure of the best title for the article.

Step 2 — Create a place for discussion

If the discussion does not already exist, create a section at the bottom of the talk page of the page you have requested to be moved. This can take any form that is reasonable for administrators to follow, although it is convenient to use the heading ==Requested move==, because this is assumed by the templates in steps 1 and 3. The template {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} can be used to create a framework for a poll, but be aware that polling can be divisive.

Once the requested move process is at an end, the only record of the requested move is kept on the talk page of the article. The current page name and the suggested new name must be placed at the top of the section where the move is discussed so that editors who read the talk page in the future can see clearly what the proposed move was.

Step 3 — Add the request to the "Other proposals" list on this page

Add {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} at the top of the section under the date line, replacing PageName, NewName and reason for move with the existing title, the new name for the article and the reason for moving it. The template will include all the necessary formatting, including your signature.

Alternatively, if the new name for the article is unclear, add {{subst:RMlink?|PageName|reason for move}} at the top of the section under the date line, replacing PageName with the existing title and reason for move with the reason for moving it. The template will include all the necessary formatting, including your signature.

Moving several pages at once

An example of how to request to move a block of pages:

*([[Talk:Page A|Discuss]]) -- Rationale goes here. --~~~~
**[[Page A]] → [[Page D]]
**[[Page B]] → [[Page E]]
**[[Page C]] → [[Page F]]

On Talk:Page A, follow steps 1 and 2 above (add {{move|Page D}} to the top and create a section for discussion).
On Talk:Page B, add {{multimove|Page E|Talk:Page A}} to the top.
On Talk:Page C, add {{multimove|Page F|Talk:Page A}} to the top.

Uncontroversial proposals

Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required.

If you object to a proposal listed here, please re-list it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.

Incomplete and contested proposals

With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move request, please do not discuss move requests here. If you support an incomplete or contested move request, please consider following the instructions above to create a full move request, and move the discussion to the "Other Proposals" section below. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

• Infernus (musician) → Infernus — (Discuss) — Considering that 'Infernus' now redirects to that of the musician, it might as well merit a page move for practicality — Dark Prime (talk) 19:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Or move Infernus (disambiguation) to Infernus? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree with Dark Prime, this article should be moved to Infernus. I don't see the big need for the disambiguation page at all, especially since Infernus (car) has been proposed for deletion. Bulgakoff (talk) 14:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

• Hokkien dialect → Hokkien - The linguistic classification of Hokkien is disputed and this "Hokkien dialect" is inappropriate. Whilst "Hokkien" can also refer to Fujian Province, its most common use by far is in reference to the language. A disambig. page is not required at Hokkien as anyone seeking the article Fujian could be redirected by a disambig. at the top of the page. --Vox latina (talk) 23:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Incomplete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

• Indian media → Media of India — Literally all other "media by country" articles follow the naming convention "Media of x". There is no objective reason that the media article for India should differ from this standard. Neelix (talk) 21:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Are you sure that this standardization is necessary? "Indian media" sounds much better to me than "Media of India". I also think it should be "Media in India", rather than "of". (NB, to clarify, "all the other articles follow the naming convention" because Neelix recently moved quite a few others.) 87.115.34.24 (talk) 21:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Title standardization is a healthy and generally accepted process for the project in general, as is evidenced by the large number of naming conventions for specific types of articles currently in use. Employing differing titles to refer to the same concept in different countries suggests a difference in content, which is not the case. I looked at all the "Media by country" articles, and saw that over half employed "of", less than half employed "in", and the other two employed a demonym, as in the case of Indian media. Either of the three options would have worked, but choosing one as a standard is a valuable and well-established practice. This article was the only one I was not able to move myself. Is there any reason that this last article should not be standardized other than that the current title subjectively sound better? Neelix (talk) 10:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

• Front Row (software) → Front Row — Front Row currently redirects to Front Row (software). As the software has been recognized as the primary article, the qualifier "(software)" is unnecessary. Neelix (talk) 15:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  • How was it "recognized as the primary article"? The only discussion on the talk page about disambiguation is inconclusive at best. older ≠ wiser 17:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
    • It is currently recognized by the project as the primary article because Front Row redirects there. I'm not saying that it is the primary article, and I'm not suggesting that any amount of discussion at all has resulted in this recognition, but the current state of affairs makes such a recognition. I would be quite happy if the disambiguation page was moved to the Front Row title instead, but having Front Row as a redirect anywhere unacceptable. It should either be a disambiguation page or the primary article. Neelix (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

• Linux → Linux (GNU/Linux) —()— this would allow both names to be treated equally, without bias to either one. And neutrality is one of Wikipedia's top mandates after all. Ensign Q (talk) 23:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Incomplete. JPG-GR (talk) 23:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose, endless discussion of this in archives and general agreement that the current title is the most common one. Parentheses misused in the proposed name. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me, but Sun Microsystems and a bunch of other companies use the term GNU/Linux. So simply ignoring the name is complete bias.

However, I also understand that the name Linux to describe the operating system came first, and is used widely, so I won't ignore that name either.

I further understand that this issue will never be solved, ever. It is simply impossible. Had Linux-GNU/Linux been made by a company, it would have been simpler. But it wasn't. We simply have to accept the fact that there are two official names to describe this operating system; there is no "right" answer. We shouldn't force the name "Linux" to the readers; we should instead let the reader decide for themselves which name they prefer, and that means we can't make the article give prominance to one name over the other. It is is simply unacceptable.

The reasoning behind renaming the article "Linux (GNU/Linux)" is:

a) It respects both names.

b) It respects that the name "Linux" to describe the OS came first.

c) It makes each name equal.

If it isn't to your liking, then we could go for "Linux-GNU/Linux" or "Linux*GNU/Linux" or similar.

In the end though, the current title is not respecting Wikipedia goal for neutrality.

64.230.125.250 (talk) 14:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC) (aka Ensign_Q)

• Value (philosophy) → Value (ethics) — The whole article deals with "ethic or philosophic value", but ethics may be regarded as a subdivision of philosophy, and the whole article, as far as I can see, only deals with that subdivision. For instance, intrinsic value already has (ethics) as an attribute. I know many redirects need to be changed, but I can deal with the main part of that. — The world deserves the truth (talk) 11:02, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

The article is a bit messy, but it does speak about values other than ethics (e.g. economics). It would be sensible to discuss before moving. 87.114.17.201 (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

The fact that it doesn't clearly mean ethic value specifically probably contributes significantly to the mess. Value (economics) already has an own article - the article just describes the possible correlation between it and ethic value. I suggest this discussion be continued on its talk page. The world deserves the truth (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Other proposals

Please use the correct template; see the instructions above. Do not attempt to copy and paste formatting from another listing.

Purge the cache to refresh this page

14 October 2008

• The Whitechapel Murders (1888-91) → Whitechapel murders —()— Disambiguation using dates and definite article is unnecessary. Use of definite articles in article names is deprecated at Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Avoid the definite article ("the") and the indefinite article ("a"/"an") at the beginning of the page name. --DrKiernan (talk) 12:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

13 October 2008

• Seattle → Seattle, Washington —()— This page was improperly moved last month without achieving proper consensus, and with a very vague reference to the AP Stylebook. The longstanding consensus is that US city articles be named using the consensus of 'city, state' and not 'city', per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (settlements), and the discussion that was previously brought forth did not produce any valid reasons for overturning this long-standing naming convention. It is clear that more discussion needs to be done on this, and circumventing this process by having discussion only on a single city's talk page without informing the community is a violation of our democratic principles that we, as wikipedians, should value so dearly. If you're going to use the AP Stylebook as our convention, then fine, let's use it; but instead of selectively applying that criteria to a single city, let's apply it to all articles that they mention. Dr. Cash (talk) 19:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

As an additional note, there are currently two similar discussions for possible moving open, as the rogue city movers want to move other cities without properly informing the community of their intentions. Please see Talk:New Orleans, Louisiana#Requested moves and Talk:Boston, Massachusetts#One more attempt at a move to "Boston" for these discussions. Dr. Cash (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

• Both the Seattle move and the New Orleans move were listed on this page (see below under 9 October for the New Orleans one), which is the place for "properly informing the community of their intentions." What exactly are you objecting to? Deor (talk) 21:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
• Note to closing admin, there was uncivil canvassing calling editors Nazis. rootology (C)(T) 14:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

• WLFF → WSYN —()— The change on WSYN was a frequency change, not a format change, so the new call letters and format for the former WSYN frequency were irrelevant after all --Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

• WSYN → WLFF —()— It could be argued that WYAK became WLFF and simply changed its frequency, even though a name change and minor format change were involved too --Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

• Aeroparque Jorge Newbery → Jorge Newbery Airport —()— This is the only airport article I know of on the English Wikipedia that uses a non-English version of the word airport/airpark/aerodrome/airfield, etc. The standard convention here has been to use an English version of the name (i.e. Düsseldorf International Airport instead of the German Flughafen Düsseldorf International.) I had previously requested a move to Jorge Newbery Airpark, but it was pointed out that Jorge Newbery Airport the more common English usage. Other Wikipedias have also changed the name to their native languages: the German article Flughafen Buenos Aires-Jorge Newbery, the Lithuanian article Jorge Newbery oro uostas and Polish article Port lotniczy Jorge Newbery. --Zyxw (talk) 16:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

• Striker → Forward (association football) —()— The current title of this article is not appropriate. The term "striker" may encompass centre-forwards and second strikers, but it is not commonly used to refer to wing forwards such as Cristiano Ronaldo or Lionel Messi. I certainly would never refer to either of those two as a striker. The term "forward", however, refers to any player who plays in an advanced role, whether they be a striker, a second striker or a winger. The disambiguator "association football" is only necessary to disambiguate from other articles about forwards. --– PeeJay 09:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

12 October 2008

• Wall (Western Sahara) → Moroccan Wall —()— Bring in line with WP:NAME & WP:DISAMBIG --Reisio (talk) 23:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

• Web brigades → Government manipulation of the internet —()— The article is mostly about government manipulation of the internet Web brigades is a really vague naming of the article -- Mariah-Yulia (talk) 21:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

• Morion (helmet) → Morion —()— A GoogleFight revealed that there were more hits for "morion" the helmet than for "morion" the mineral. I think it would be more helpful to have the page "Morion" link to the article for the helmet, and to have the mineral article be renamed "Morion (mineral)") --Witan (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

• GPRS_Tunnelling_Protocol → GPRS_Tunneling_Protocol —()— Typo is the page name, makes it harder to find it from the search box. --Julienforgeat (talk) 10:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Y Done NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 15:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
    • why did you move it now without consensus? See the discussion page: the move is opposed. 87.115.25.106 (talk) 19:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

11 October 2008

• Poland Is Not Yet Lost → Mazurek Dąbrowskiego —()— See talk for detail. The suggested native name of the Polish anthem is the internationally accepted norm for all anthems in languages other than English. See talk also for advanced search statistics. --Poeticbent talk 18:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

• Pentatope number -> Pentachoral number -)- See talk page for detail. Georgia guy (talk) 16:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

• List of newspapers in Ireland → List of newspapers in the Republic of Ireland —()— Only contains newspapers in the Republic of Ireland--Googlechrome (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

• Derek Kwok → Derek Kok —()— This is the correct last name of the HK artist as stated on his blog and other resources on the Internet. --~DARK_PRINZE~ (talk) 11:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Was incomplete, relisting and placing the survey.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

• MAVEN (spacecraft) → MAVEN —()— The only MAVEN is the spacecraft, hence no need for parens. --Potatoswatter (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

• Binary-compatibility → Binary compatibility —()— Binary compatibility redirects to Application binary interface, and hyphenation is wrong --Jerome Potts (talk) 06:29, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

• Bravo (US TV channel) → Bravo (U.S. TV channel) - ()- The move wanted to abbreviate the article and it will use NCA. 125.212.124.65 (talk) 00:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

10 October 2008

• Aravane Rezai → Aravane Rezaï —()— The move will re-instate the diacritic, which is accurate, appropriate, and in accordance with naming conventions and all other articles where diacritics are used. --Maedin\^talk 18:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

• Recognition of same-sex unions in Connecticut → Same-sex marriage in Connecticut —()— Given the decision of the Connecticut Supreme Court to legalize same-sex marriage in the state, it makes sense to move this page so that its naming conforms with Same-sex marriage in California and Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts. --Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

• Twins (film) → Twins (1988 film) —()— per naming convention for film article --Neo-Jay (talk) 17:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Contested: WP:PRIMARYUSAGE. I think a blockbuster that grossed $112m is more important than erotica. 87.113.103.202 (talk) 17:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:PRIMARYUSAGE does not apply here because Twins (film) is already Not a primary page. See Talk:Twins (film) for more discussion. --Neo-Jay (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

• Body of Lies (film) → Body of Lies —()— Brewcrewer (talk · contribs) considers the film the primary topic. --Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

• Union Party (Norway) → Unity Party (Norway) —()— "Union Party" is a misleading translation of the Norwegian name "Samlingspartiet" --Barend (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

• Bill O'Reilly (commentator) → Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) —()— Because it doesn't disambiguate sufficiently. Bill O'Reilly (cricketer) had a notable career as a commentator too; just as a sports commentator --Dweller (talk) 10:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

• Plans (drawings) → Plans — (Discuss) — The latter already redirects to the former. — Gary King (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Or move to Plan (drawing) or Plan (diagram), and redirect Plans to Plan? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

• Recognition of same-sex unions in Connecticut → Same-sex marriage in Connecticut —()— Given the decision of the Connecticut Supreme Court to legalize same-sex marriage in the state, it makes sense to move this page so that its naming conforms with Same-sex marriage in California and Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts. --Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC) We have put in a request a couple days ago for this article to be renamed, and no move has taken place yet. I am reposting this request again, hoping it can take place soon, i assume it was over looked before.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 02:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

• Snow (singer) → Snow (Japanese singer) —()— The much more notable artist "Snow (musician)" should have "Snow (singer)" redirect to him and a dablink placed on his page to the J-Pop singer if her article passes notability --TheTruthiness (talk) 02:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

9 October 2008

• American Association of Blood Banks → AABB —()— article was moved inappropriately to expand an acronym, but the name is no longer an acronym as explicitly cited in the article from the organization's own web page. It is now just a four letter name in capitals. The current location should obviously redirect to the correct location instead of being a disambiguation page. The article was formerly hatnoted for the other definition, which is an acronym. --SDY (talk) 01:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• Religion and ecology → Religion and environmentalism —()— more accurate description. ---- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• De Bono Hats → Six Thinking Hats —()— current name is inconsistent with existing print media and franchised training, and is biased --Innovationbrain (talk) 22:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• Shepherd's Bush tube station (Central Line) → Shepherd's Bush tube station —()— Disambiguation in title is no longer required, as other station with same name has now been renamed. --Jorvik (talk) 19:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)} Jorvik (talk) 19:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• 2009 UEFA Women's Championship → UEFA Women's Euro 2009 —()— Multiple move; registered and easier name, consistency with mens' UEFA Euro 2008 --Pudeo⺮ 15:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• KitKat Crescent → Bootham Crescent —()— English football stadium. Sponsored names should not be used for stadia - see featured articles Valley Parade and Priestfield Stadium, for example. --Dancarney (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• New Orleans, Louisiana → New Orleans — () — Just like the article titles for Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle and many other major American cities, the state is used for the title so just have New Orleans, Louisiana redirect to New Orleans Boris Badinov44 (talk) 04:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Backlog

Move dated sections here after five days have passed (October 8 or older).

• Violence of Summer → Violence of Summer (Love's Taking Over) —()— This is the correct title as listed on the single cover, which can clearly be seen on the article itself - for some reason I can't move it, no matter how many times I try, it just says "Error: Could not submit form" in small type. --Rogerb67 (talk) 00:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

• Rachel Gibson (writer) → Rachel Gibson —()— Target is currently a disambiguation page for two items. Per WP:DAB the suggested minimum before creating a dab page is three. The real person should be listed under her own name. Otto4711 (talk) 17:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC) --Otto4711 (talk) 17:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

• Safety on Singapore Mass Rapid Transit → Safety on the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) —()— The main article on the subject is "Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)", "Safety on Singapore Mass Rapid Transit" does not appear to be the official name of the mass rapid transit system and thus is grammatically incorrect, and "Safety on the Mass Rapid Transit" is potentially ambiguous. The following related articles also require moving. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 15:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Facilities on the Mass Rapid Transit → Facilities on the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)
  • Fares and ticketing on the Mass Rapid Transit → Fares and ticketing on the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)
  • History of the Mass Rapid Transit → History of the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)
  • Security on the Mass Rapid Transit → Security on the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)

• Right → Rights — (Discuss) — target name is currently a redirect to current name; very old consensus on talk page suggested this move, but it never happened — Pfhorrest (talk) 08:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
  • That old discussion is very short. More discussion is needed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Discussion has resumed. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 20:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

• • Relisting. JPG-GR (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

• Greatest Hit (Annie song) → The Greatest Hit —()— Originally titled "The Greatest Hit". PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 15:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC) --PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 15:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

• Pine Hills, California → Pine Hill, California —()— This article is incorrectly named due to the US Census error of listing the community name in the plural, "Hills." If the example given of Lisco, Nebraska is the correct way to manage this issue, why not fix it? --Norcalal 06:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

• Israeli navy → Israel Navy —()— See talk page (#Name of this article) - no objections for move for a month. Also in line with other major Israeli security forces units like Israel Defense Forces, Israel Police and Israel Prison Service. --Ynhockey ^(Talk) 17:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

• Decolonization of Africa → Decolonisation of Africa —()— The page has strong ties to particular English-speaking nations in Africa and Europe, yet it is written in a different regional form of English which plainly fails to reflect that. --92.1.75.227 (talk) 23:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia content modification information:

• This page was last modified on 14 October 2008, at 14:33.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:Requested moves".

The URL for this specific entry is:

• http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.