This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Society, sports, law, and sex is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
- Talk:World Wrestling All-Stars Quotes do not seem encyclopaedic and do not have references.
- Talk:Cure Autism Now Should the article be merged/redirected or left alone?
- Talk:Olympic Council of Ireland A determined group of editors has decided to ensure that the term "Republic of Ireland" may not appear in this article, even though other editors consider that it is necessary to make clear to readers that the OCI represents the Republic and not the whole island of Ireland.
- Talk:YouPorn Is it a reason for us not linking to YouPorn?
- Talk:Felony disenfranchisement Disagreement over style
- Talk:WrestleCrap edit war over whether "the late" is appropriate when referring to Merle Vincent, who is deceased
- Talk:The Man Who Would Be Queen The book "The Man Who Would Be Queen. The Science of Gender Bending and Transsexualism" caused an uproar when it was released that continues to this day. Last year a special issue of "Archives of Sexual Behavior" a psychology journal, was devoted to this controversy and a number of peer commentaries on the article, and the ideas in the book in general. We have already been through the Reliable sourced notice board. The result was that the peer reviewed article is a reliable source, but that the usability of the peer commentaries should follow WP:SPS. The question is just what makes one an expert, just the strict letter of SPS or the more general common sense notion of an expert as being someone with knowledge and experience of the topic.
- Talk:Paella Please help us find reliable historic information for the evolution of Paella. Several editors seem to be arguing over this rather minor issue. These are: user:Bluee Mountain, user:Mountolive, user:Warrington, anonymous user:169.139.19.214 (Texas Pete), and user:LuisGomez111 (myself)
- Talk:Australian diaspora Is this article neutral, notable, verifiable etc.?
- Talk:Dignity revert war
To add a discussion to RFC:
- Add {{RFCsoc| section=section name !! reason=a short summary of the discussion !! time= ~~~~~ }} to the talk page section where the discussion will be held.
- Mind the exclamation marks! Do not use pipe symbols to separate the parameters.
- Warning:
!and=will not work, as they are used to separate parameters.{{and}}might work outside of the time parameter. The vertical pipe (|) works again. - To add an entry manually, click the "add a discussion" link. On the top of the list, note the name of the page and a short summary of the discussion.
- For more information, see Wikipedia:Requests for comments.
- Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comments.
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 15 November 2008, at 16:05.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Society, sports, law, and sex".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.