Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

Shortcuts:
WP:RFC/NAME
WP:RFCN

This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be inappropriate under Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:

  • For blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, post to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
  • For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
  • If the username is NOT blatantly inappropriate, and the user has made no edits, do not post as there is no need to take any action.
  • If you wish to contest or question the blocking of a user by an administrator, please do not post the issue here. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator or with other administrators.
  • Make sure that the user in question has not already been blocked prior to bringing their username here.
  • The user in question should first be notified on their talk page about the concern regarding their username before adding the report here.

You may wish to use {{subst:uw-username}} for this purpose. Do not list a user here unless they have refused to change their username or have continued to edit without reply. If after that you still believe someone has chosen an inappropriate username under Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here and explain which part of the username policy you think it violates.

Contents

Instructions for closing administrators

This page has Archives:

  1. To May 1, 2007
  2. Alphabetical (current)

Tools: Special:Listusers, Special:Ipblocklist

List requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|reason ~~~~}}


Reports

Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). Bolded recommendations are not necessary. There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.

Beauchamps High School

Beauchamps High School (talk ยท contribs)

Account's edits to date are all constructive, but are all to Beauchamps School. Username would appear to be in breach of the username policy because it is effectively a company/group name solely editing about itself. I raised the issue of the username with the editor(s?) in September, but had no reply, and the account has edited again today. Thoughts? BencherliteTalk 14:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't see a problem, as long as they are constructive. There certainly wouldn't be a problem with a User:PhilliesFan from editing Philadelphia Phillies. That being said, a warning about WP:NPOV and WP:COI would be appropriate. GrszReview! 14:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes, but here we've got the equivalent of User:Philadelphia Phillies giving the impression through its name of being the official voice of the school since the account uses the full name of the school to edit; it's not a name likeUser:Beauchamps High School fan or User:Beauchamps High School student. BencherliteTalk 14:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The account is implying, and is obviously, being shared by more than one user. They should be notified of this. Wisdom89 (T / C) 14:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. This sounds too much like a role account, and it should be renamed. Shereth 15:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Just so that I'm clear on my position. Yes, this smacks of a role account, and I feel, like Shereth, that it should definitely be renamed. Wisdom89 (T / C) 18:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I would require renaming as well. Even if it is not actually being shared, it gives the impression of being an "official" or role account, which is not permitted. --MCB (talk) 04:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Require rename as role account. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes. Not to be redundant, but WP:NOSHARE and Meta:Role account are pretty clear about this. If they continue to edit without joining the discussion I think they should probably be temporarily blocked until they choose a new name. -kotra (talk) 04:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia content modification information:

  • This page was last modified on 11 November 2008, at 04:09.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names".

The URL for this specific entry is:

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.