Welcome to the MedLibrary.org Wikipedia Supplement on Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Peer review -- Please Click to Return to Front Page

Comics Portal
WikiProject Comics talk ⇒ Get Involved talk ⇒ Notice Board talk ⇒ Peer Review talk ⇒ Request Cleanup talk ⇒ Tasks to be Completed talk ⇒ Assessments talk  → New! B-Class FAQ Resources ⇒ Copyright talk ⇒ Editorial Guidelines talk ⇒ Exemplars talk ⇒ Manual of style talk ⇒ Naming Conventions talk ⇒ References talk ⇒ Statistics talk ⇒ Templates talk Workgroups ⇒ British comics talk ⇒ Comics creators talk ⇒ Comic strips talk ⇒ DC Comics talk ⇒ European comics talk ⇒ Marvel Comics talk ⇒ United States comics talk ⇒ Webcomics talk ⇒ World comics talk
Category:WikiProject Comics  v • d • e

This page is specifically for requests for Peer review. Please place all Requests for comment on the project's Notice board, and all requests for cleanup on the project's cleanup request page.

The peer review department of the Comics WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.

The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.

All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Comics WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.

Contents 1 Instructions 1.1 Requesting a review 1.2 Responding to a request 1.3 Archiving 2 Requests 2.1 List of The Simpsons comics 2.2 The Order of the Stick 2.3 Scrooge McDuck 2.4 Comics Guaranty LLC 2.5 Marvel: The End 2.6 Batwoman 3 Archives

Instructions

Requesting a review

1. Add peer-review=yes to the {{Comicsproj}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).
2. From there, click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article.
3. Place === [[Name of nominated article]] === at the top.
4. Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign by using four tildes (~~~~).
5. Add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} at the top of the list of requests on this page.

If an article is listed for a second (or third, and so forth) peer review:

1. Move the existing peer review subpage (Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Peer review/Name of nominated article) to an archive (Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Peer review/Name of nominated article/Archive 1).
2. Follow the instructions for making a request above (editing the primary page, which will be a redirect to the archive, into a new request page).
3. Be sure to provide a prominent link to the last archive at the top of the request (e.g. "Prior peer review here.").

Responding to a request

Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.

Archiving

Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:

1. Replace peer-review=yes with old-peer-review=yes in the {{Comicsproj}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page
2. Move {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} from this page to the current archive page.

Requests

List of The Simpsons comics

I have listed this article for peer review because I've rewritten most of the article and now I need feedback on how to improve it further. Also, what grade on the assessment scale would you rate it (the article looked like this before I began working on it and it was rated Start-class back then).

Thanks, TheLeftorium 16:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Looks pretty damn good to me. We haven't got an A-Class review process in place at the moment, but I'd suggest you request a GA review. Personally I think you may be able to go straight at FL status, but I'm not familiar with the criteria. The only issues the automated peer review came up with that may be relevant are:

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]
• You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. ^[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, and bloody good work, Hiding T 13:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

The Order of the Stick

I've been working to bring this article up to speed, particularly with regards to references and real-world context. Traditionally, it (and especially its related sub-articles) have gotten bogged down in lengthy plot regurgitations, and I'd like to see if I've managed to stem that on the main article before I start working on the sub-articles. I'd like to see this go all the way to Featured Article--right now, the only FA on webcomics is Megatokyo--so any help you could give would be appreciated. Thanks --Ig8887 (talk) 05:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Scrooge McDuck

This article has a lot of potential but really needs some feedback from objective editors. The more details the better, would really appreciate it. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 01:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

A good start but it need a lot of more work.

• The hole article need to be referenced with reliable sources.
• The lead should be a summery of the article. For example the discussion in the third paragraph is not mentioned in the body of the article.
• The Money Bin should either be merged or the template be removed.
• I think the names in "Also known as" in the infobox should be removed. He have lots and lots of nicknames used in a few stories, "The Master of the Mississippi" etc etc. "Uncle Scrooge" would be suitable here, maybe "The Richest Duck in the World" too.
• "Comics history" is unbalanced. There are a lot of text about "Voodoo Hoodoo" and "Trail of the Unicorn", minor characters and things like his private airplane while more impotant stories like "Only a Poor Old Man" and "Back to the Klondike" is just mentioned in one sentence. Also more important characters like Flintheart, Beagle Boys and Magica de Spell are mentioned very briefly or not at all, same with things like money bin, number one dime etc.
• The transition from supporting to main character when "Uncle Scrooge" was introduced in 1952 should be clearer.
• More information about the time after Barks is needed.

Skizzik (talk) 10:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Comics Guaranty LLC

I was concerned that this article was strongly POV. I have tried to rework it to include criticism, but in a more neutral manner. I've finally completed what I think is a satisfactory draft of the article, but I would like to invite fresh eyes to take a look at it. Thanks! --GentlemanGhost (talk) 22:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Marvel: The End

I tried copy editing the plot summary, but I'm not familiar enough with the story to complete the job. Can someone else take a whack at it? Konczewski 02:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Batwoman

Batwoman was recently promoted to GA and I would like a peer review to prepare it for FA. Bookkeeperoftheoccult (talk) 10:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Review by JasonKling213 (talk · contribs)

Introduction

• Batwoman (originally referred to as The Bat-Woman) is a fictional superheroine and the female counterpart to the superhero Batman. This character appears in publications produced by DC Comics and related media, created by Bob Kane and Sheldon Moldoff.

Publication history

• The contents of her utility purse were actually weapons disguised as stereotypical feminine products such as lipstick, cosmetic compacts, charm bracelets and hair nets.

Skills resources and abilities

• While the Siver Age Batwoman used weaponry disguised as feminine products, the Modern Age Batwoman's arsenal includes a baton-like device which can extend from the center in length and has Bat-shaped attachments at each end Batarangs as well as a Batman-inspired grappling hook.[20]

Archives

• 2008
• 2007
• 2006

Wikipedia content modification information:

• This page was last modified on 10 September 2008, at 17:31.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Peer review".

The URL for this specific entry is:

• http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Peer_review

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.