Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Assessment

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Assessment is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

WikiProject History

The Assessment department finds historical articles for the first time and rate them on quality and importance scales.

The articles are rated by examining them and comparing them to the quality and importance scales. A template is then place on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject History and displaying what rating the article has been given].

Historical articles can be found in Category:History and its subcategories

Progress
History
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 3 4 104 112
A 12 12
Good article GA 1 8 5 157 171
B 20 18 22 6 1003 1069
C 3 6 8 7 190 214
Start 11 17 27 20 2932 3007
Stub 5 9 14 3289 3317
List 53 53
Assessed 34 48 77 56 7740 7955
Unassessed 1 1 1 7331 7334
Total 35 49 78 56 15071 15289

Template

This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a group devoted to the the study, and improvement of Wikipedia articles on the subject, of History. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Usage

The following is the full syntax used for placing this template on a talk page:


{{WikiProject History
|small=
|nested=
|class=
|importance=
|Attention= 
|A-Class=
|peer-review=
|old-peer-review=
<!-- B-Class checklist -->
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all 
major points are appropriately cited. -->
|B-Class-1=
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and 
does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|B-Class-2=
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including 
a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|B-Class-3=
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B-Class-4=
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, 
such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=
<!-- 6. It is written from a neutral point of view. -->
|B-Class-6=
<!-- Task forces -->
}}

General parameters:

  • small – "yes" if the banner should be rendered in its miniature size; this should be used sparingly and only on crowded talk pages for the time being.
  • nested – "yes" if the banner is being used in conjunction with {{WikiProjectBannerShell}}.
  • class – a rating of the article's quality; see the quality scale for more details.
  • importance - a rating of the article's quality; see the importance scale for more details.
  • Attention – "yes" if the article is extremely low quality and requires the attention of experienced editors.
  • A-Classcurrent/pass/fail
  • peer-review – "yes"
  • old-peer-review – "yes"

B-Class checklist (available only for articles rated as "Stub-Class", "Start-Class", or "B-Class":

Contents

Quality scale

Featured articles

Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review

Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates

A-Class

Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.

A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.

Good articles

Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.

Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.

B-Class

The article meets the following six criteria:

  1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
  2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
  3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
  4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
  5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
  6. It is written from a neutral point of view

B-Class articles are selected by individual assessors.

Start Class

Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.

Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.

Stub Class

Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject

Stub articles are selected by individual assessors

Importance scale

Need The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
Top Subject is a must-have for a good encyclopedia
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid Subject fills in more minor details
Low Subject is mainly of specialist interest.

Wikipedia content modification information:

  • This page was last modified on 6 February 2008, at 18:00.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Assessment".

The URL for this specific entry is:

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.