Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Assessment

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Assessment is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

History of science
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 8 8 2 20
A 2 2
Good article GA 2 6 9 1 18
B 14 57 83 24 28 206
C 1 5 10 3 3 22
Start 9 37 86 86 30 248
Stub 20 68 12 100
Assessed 30 113 216 183 74 616
Unassessed 2 8 11 363 384
Total 30 115 224 194 437 1000

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject History of Science! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's history of science related articles (including history of technology, history of medicine, science studies, STS, etc.). While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{HistSci}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:History of science articles by quality and Category:History of science articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of WikiProject History of Science is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{HistSci}} banner on its talk page:

{{HistSci| ... | class=??? | ...}}
Featured article FA
A
Good article GA
B
Start
Stub
???
Needed

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:


Template
Disambig
Category
NA

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed-Class history of science articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:History of science articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale


Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{HistSci}} banner on its talk page:

{{HistSci| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about the history of science. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are are included as sections of the main History of science, History of medicine, and History of technology articles. A reader who is not involved in the field will have high familiarity with the subject matter (or at least its significance). Only a handful of the broadest articles will be assessed with Top importance. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Scientific Revolution, History of biology
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding the history of science. Most readers will have some knowledge of the subject (or at least its significance). Famous historical figures and histories of the main scientific disciplines may have High importance. Articles at this level cover particular issues related to the history of science, specific terms are used to detail the topic. History of molecular biology, Galileo Galilei
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of science. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Moderately important scientists and histories of subdisciplines will be marked with Mid importance. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not so broadly significant as High-importance topics. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles may have more technical terms used in the article text German nuclear energy project, G. Ledyard Stebbins
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of the history of science. Few readers outside the field or that are not history of science students may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Lesser known scientists, events, and publications might be listed with Low importance. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the history of science, or are only tangentially related to the history of science. An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump, "The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance"

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  • Prehistoric Medicine: Last assessment was on the 26th January. There have been numerous additions/revisions to the article since then and is now, in my opinion, worthy of more than a 'Start'. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 17:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Assessment log

History of science articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

November 14, 2008

October 29, 2008

October 26, 2008

October 19, 2008

October 15, 2008

October 12, 2008

October 8, 2008

  • Rutherford model reassessed from Start-Class (Mid-Class) to C-Class (Mid-Class)

October 5, 2008

October 1, 2008

September 28, 2008

(No changes today)

September 26, 2008

September 19, 2008

(No changes today)

September 15, 2008

(No changes today)

September 12, 2008

September 7, 2008

September 3, 2008

August 31, 2008

August 24, 2008

August 20, 2008

(No changes today)

August 13, 2008

August 11, 2008

August 6, 2008

August 4, 2008

July 31, 2008

(No changes today)

July 28, 2008

July 24, 2008

July 21, 2008

July 17, 2008

July 14, 2008

July 3, 2008

June 30, 2008

June 27, 2008

(No changes today)

Wikipedia content modification information:

  • This page was last modified on 24 May 2008, at 17:45.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Assessment".

The URL for this specific entry is:

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.