Welcome to the MedLibrary.org Wikipedia Supplement on Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review -- Please Click to Return to Front Page

Shortcut: WP:INPR

IMPORTANT: If you wish to make a peer-review request, please follow the instructions here.

The peer review department of the India WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.

The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.

All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the India WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.

Contents 1 Instructions 1.1 Requesting a review 1.2 Responding to a request 1.3 Archiving 1.4 Peer-review Team 2 Requests 2.1 S. A. Dange 2.2 List of Governors of Tamil Nadu 2.3 Vijayawada 2.4 Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War 2.5 List of Indian states by the etymology of their name 2.6 India House 2.7 DLF Universal Limited 2.8 Foreign relations of India 2.9 Valparai 2.10 Faruqi dynasty 2.11 S. Kumarasamy 2.12 Hemu 2.13 ICFAI 2.14 Uttar Pradesh Technical University 2.15 Kerala High Court 2.16 The Great Indian Novel 2.17 Anand (2004 film) 2.18 Historical definitions of races in India 2.19 Dravidian people 2.20 North South Foundation 2.21 Tata Elxsi 2.22 Krishna Institute of Engineering and Technology 2.23 Combined Defence Services Examination 2.24 Union Public Service Commission

Instructions

Requesting a review

If you wish to request for a review, you need to follow the following steps.

1. Go to the article you wish to nominate for peer review, then click on the "talk page" tab, then click on the "edit this page" tab.
2. At the top, you should find the {{WP India}} project banner which looks something like {{WP India|class=|importance=}}
3. Add peer-review=yes to the banner so that it looks like code>{{WP India|class=|importance=|peer-review=yes}} (see the project banner instructions if you need more details)
4. Click on the "save page" button.
5. Click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the WikiProject India banner now. This will open a (new) page to discuss the review of your article.
6. Place === [[Name of nominated article]] === at the top. Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign your request by using four tildes (~~~~).
7. Go to the list of requests, and click the "edit" tab. Add {{Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} at the top of the requests, and click on the "save page" button.
8. Check regularly to see if your article has been peer-reviewed, so that you can see the comments given, and be sure to thank any editors who have spent their time and effort peer-reviewing your article. Make any of the suggested changes in your article.
9. If you have received no response to your peer-review request for quite some time, feel free to contact one of the bolded members of the WikiProject India peer-review department, listed at the bottom of these instructions.

Responding to a request

Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible. Make sure to sign your requests too by using four tildes (~~~~).

Archiving

Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, but must have had at least 1 peer review. However, at least 2 different peer-reviews (by at least 2 different editors) is ideal. Reviews can also be archived if the article has been successful as a featured article candidate.

To archive:

1. Replace peer-review=yes with old-peer-review=yes in the {{WP India}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page
2. Move {{Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review/Name of nominated article}} from this page to the current archive page.

Peer-reviews that have been conducted prior to this year can be found at the 2006 WikiProject India peer-review and 2007 WikiProject India peer-review pages.

Peer-review Team

If you would like to join the peer-review team, please add your name below. Members of the team who are bolded (below) are currently active members of the peer review team and are likely to peer-review articles, and answer any queries you have in relation to their peer review. Particularly if you have received no response for some time on your peer-review request, please feel free to contact the members that are bolded and listed here.

1. Anupam (talk · contribs)
2. Bakasuprman (talk · contribs)
3. DaGizza (talk · contribs)
4. Faizhaider (talk · contribs)
5. Ganeshk (talk · contribs)
6. Kanchanamala (talk · contribs)
7. Kensplanet (talk · contribs)
8. Ncmvocalist (talk · contribs) - maintenance of this peer-review department
9. RegentsPark (talk · contribs)
10. Rohit_klar (talk · contribs)
11. Salilb (talk · contribs)
12. Tinucherian (talk · contribs)

Requests

S. A. Dange

I wish to take this article to FL class. I would really aprreciate your comments.Weblogan (talk) 08:06, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Governors of Tamil Nadu

I would like to take this to FL. I would really appreciate your comments on how to further improve it. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 01:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Vijayawada

This article has never been peer-reviewed. It needs reviewing and also deserves B-Class rating, but it has been assessed as Start-Class (probably two or three years back). I also request to re-access the article.

Vijay Sai (talk) 08:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War

I just went over this article, from virtually nothing to add a whole lot of info + references, which didn't exist before. I also added an infobox for better/easier navigation. I was wondering if someone could review this? Thanks, Lihaas (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

List of Indian states by the etymology of their name

People, I created this list a while back. A similar list for the US states has been a featured article. How can we bring this to that level ? I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations (talk) 02:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

India House

I wish to have this article peer review for language, spelling, NPOV, structure and scope and improve this, as far a possible, to FA status since I wish to nominate it once review is done.

Thanks, rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 19:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

DLF Universal Limited

This company was just featured on CNBC, so I looked at the page, only to find an advertisment competing with a political slant. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Foreign relations of India

I have restructured the whole article and added some countries & international organisations. So I am requesting for peer review so that it can be improved to a featured article.

Vijay Sai (talk) 12:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Valparai

Blocks of text on "History of Valparai" alongwith some texts were removed in accordance with Neutrality, Verifiability and NOR issues. Also, more reliable sources, such as newspaper articles and information form government departments have been added with references.Dilli2040 (talk) 04:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Faruqi dynasty

I believe the peer review will help in improving the style, reference and presentation of the article.Joy1963 (talk) 13:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

S. Kumarasamy

I honestly beleive that a good Peer review will furthermore improve this article. --Logic riches (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hemu

This article has a lot of POV issues. Can anyone check them? Salilb (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

ICFAI

Hi, I have re-written the article and tried to cover the different entities under the ICFAI umbrella. Also tried to cover the grievances aired by a lot of students against Icfai, specifically the regarding DLP. Would like to get a comment on the same. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 10:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Uttar Pradesh Technical University

This article now has more matter than a stub-class article. deltaG (talk) 12:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Kerala High Court

For the greater benefit of all Wikipedians, I feel that this article has undergo a peer review... Adv. Ranjith Xavier (talk) 09:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Attokaran

The Great Indian Novel

This is an important novel in historical, satirical, literary, and political terms. The article lay dormant for a long time and I've tried to give it some meat. However, it is a very complex and at times subtle satire. Editors should in particular pay attention to allusions and connections that have been missed. The tables of character, place, event connections should also be worked on. Acsenray (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Anand (2004 film)

This article (currently B-class) has been substantially developed over the past couple of weeks by me. I'd love critique from my fellow-editors so that I can bring it further up on quality. Regards, Mspraveen 08:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Historical definitions of races in India

Various fringe views are being aired, and more input/review from Indian editors would be helpful. --JWB 08:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Dravidian people

Various fringe views are being aired, and more input/review from Indian editors would be helpful. --JWB 08:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

North South Foundation

I think this should be nominated because we as a community have worked hard to make it a nice article from a 2-4 sentence stub. Whaatt 19:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Tata Elxsi

It would be very helpful if someone peer-review this article. Kiran Nair 12:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Krishna Institute of Engineering and Technology

The article is now B class. Please help improve its level --deltaG 20:13, 08 July 2007 (UTC)

Combined Defence Services Examination

i created this page with the intention of providing info to the aspirants who wish get into the armed forces....i would like to know about what the fellow wikipedians think of it.... Gprince007 15:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Union Public Service Commission

i feel that a peer review will help us improve this page and make it more informative...constructive criticisms welcome ... Gprince007 14:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia content modification information:

• This page was last modified on 18 October 2008, at 08:11.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review".

The URL for this specific entry is:

• http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Peer_review

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.