Our library of drug research abstracts drawn from the medical literature is updated on a regular schedule, and you can be assured that new advair research articles will be listed here shortly after becoming available to us.
Related Sponsors
Medical research on advair
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun 1; 177(11): 1207-14
Sin DD, Man SF, Marciniuk DD, Ford G, FitzGerald M, Wong E, York E, Mainra RR, Ramesh W, Melenka LS, Wilde E, Cowie RL, Williams D, Gan WQ, Rousseau R,
RATIONALE: Small studies have suggested that inhaled corticosteroids can suppress systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of inhaled corticosteroids with or without long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist on systemic biomarkers of inflammation. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial across 11 centers (n = 289 patients with FEV(1) of 47.8 +/- 16.2% of predicted) to compare the effects of inhaled fluticasone alone or in combination with salmeterol against placebo on circulating biomarkers of systemic inflammation over 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Secondary molecules of interest were IL-6 and surfactant protein D (SP-D). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Neither fluticasone nor the combination of fluticasone/salmeterol had a significant effect on CRP or IL-6 levels. There was, however, a significant reduction in SP-D levels with fluticasone and fluticasone/salmeterol compared with placebo (P = 0.002). Health status also improved significantly in both the fluticasone and fluticasone/salmeterol groups compared with placebo, driven mostly by improvements in the symptom scores. Changes in the circulating SP-D levels were related to changes in health status scores. FEV(1) improved significantly only in the fluticasone/salmeterol group compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: ICS in conjunction with long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist do not reduce CRP or IL-6 levels in serum of patients with COPD over 4 weeks. They do, however, significantly reduce serum SP-D levels. These data suggest that these drugs reduce lung-specific but not generalized biomarkers of systemic inflammation in COPD.
Benefits of combination therapy on exacerbations in nonsmoking patients with asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Mar; 121(3): 780; author reply 780
Jackson C, Lipworth B
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007; 2(2): 169-76
Dal NR, Eandi M, Pradelli L, Iannazzo S
Current practice guidelines for the treatment of COPD recommend the use of combined inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators in severe and very severe patients (GOLD stages III and IV). The aim of this study was to evaluate, through a simulation model, the economic consequences of this recommendation in Italy. We developed a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) on five alternative therapeutic strategies (salmeterol/fluticasone, SF; formoterol! budesonide, FB; salmeterol alone, S; fluticasone alone, F; control, C). Published data on the Italian COPD population and efficacy data from international reference trials were fitted in a disease progression model based on a Markov chain representing severity stages and death. The yearly total direct costs of treating COPD patients in Italy was estimated at approximately Euro 7 billion, with a mean cost per patient per year of around Euro 2450. Mean survival of the cohort is 11.5 years. The C and F strategies were dominated (ie, are associated with worse outcomes and higher costs) by all alternatives. SF and FB were the most effective strategies, with a slight clinical superiority of SF, but they were also marginally more expensive than S. Incremental cost-effectiveness of SF vs S was Euro 679.5 per avoided exacerbation and Euro 3.3 per symptom-free day. Compared with current practice, the recommended use of combined inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators for severe and very severe COPD patients has the potential for improving clinical outcomes without increasing healthcare costs.
Comparison and optimal use of fixed combinations in the management of COPD.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007; 2(2): 107-16
Mensing M, Aalbers R
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Indications for the use of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with COPD are described in the various international guidelines, but no special recommendations are made concerning the use of combination inhalers containing a LABA as well as an ICS. To determine the place of combination inhalers in the treatment of COPD we reviewed recent literature concerning this subject. On molecular level ICS/LABA combination therapy has anti-inflammatory properties which cannot be attributed to ICS alone. All clinical studies indicate that the two available combinations (salmeterol/fluticasone and formoterol/budesonide) significantly reduce exacerbation rate of moderate/severe exacerbations when compared with placebo. Some studies also showed a significant reduction in exacerbation rate compared with LABA monotherapy, but not compared with ICS monotherapy. From the patient's perspective, ICS/LABA combination inhalers are the first choice when both need to be prescribed, possibly improving patient compliance for ICS. Currently little evidence is available to predict if flexible treatment with LABA/ICS combination inhalers will improve disease control in COPD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical benefit of combination inhalers versus the individual components in different inhalers, and to investigate the clinical benefit of flexible dosing of combination inhalers in patients with COPD.
Drugs. 2007; 67(16): 2383-405
Keating GM, McCormack PL
Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretide, Advair, Viani) administered using a multidose dry powder inhaler (Diskus, Accuhaler) is approved for use in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in numerous countries.Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate administered twice daily via dry powder inhaler is effective and generally well tolerated in patients with COPD. Although not associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality versus placebo in the TORCH study (p = 0.052), salmeterol/fluticasone propionate reduced the rate of decline in lung function over the 3 years of the trial and was associated with lower exacerbation rates than the component monotherapies or placebo; other trials revealed clinically significant improvements in health status and dyspnoea scores with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. Results of the INSPIRE trial suggest that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is associated with a significantly lower mortality rate than tiotropium bromide monotherapy in patients with COPD; the two treatments had similar effects in terms of exacerbation rates and lung function. Thus, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is an important option in the treatment of patients with COPD who are appropriate candidates for combination therapy with a long-acting bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid.
Respir Med. 2007 Dec; 101(12): 2437-46
Bousquet J, Boulet LP, Peters MJ, Magnussen H, Quiralte J, Martinez-Aguilar NE, Carlsheimer A
BACKGROUND: Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART) improves asthma control compared with fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) regimens, but its efficacy has not been assessed in comparison with sustained high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone (Seretide) plus a short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SABA). METHODS: Patients (N=2309) with symptomatic asthma (aged 12 years; forced expiratory volume in 1s 50% predicted), who had experienced an asthma exacerbation in the previous year, were randomised to receive budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg two inhalations twice daily and as needed, or one inhalation of salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 microg twice daily plus terbutaline as needed, for 6 months. RESULTS: Time to first severe exacerbation, the pre-specified primary outcome, was not significantly prolonged (risk ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.63, 1.05). Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduced total exacerbations from 31 to 25 events/100 patients/year (P=0.039), and exacerbations requiring hospitalisation/emergency room (ER) treatment from 13 to 9 events/100 patients/year (P=0.046). The treatments showed no difference in measures of lung function or asthma symptoms. The mean dose of ICS received was lower using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (792 microg/day budesonide [1238 microg/day beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalent] versus 1000 microg/day fluticasone [2000 microg/day BDP equivalent] with salmeterol/fluticasone therapy; P
Respir Med. 2007 Dec; 101(12): 2488-94
Kawai M, Kempsford R, Pullerits T, Takaori S, Hashimoto K, Takemoto Y, Lötvall J
INTRODUCTION: The effect of ethnicity on the efficacy of salmeterol (S)+fluticasone propionate (FP) has not been examined in Japanese and Caucasian asthmatics. In this study, the efficacy of combination treatment with S and FP from a single inhaler (SFC) was compared with concurrent treatment with S and FP administration from separate inhalers (S+FP) in Japanese and Caucasian asthmatics. METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, crossover study in male and female Japanese (n=18) and Caucasian (n=17) asthmatics (50-100% predicted FEV(1); >35% reversibility in sGaw). Subjects received SFC (S 50 mcg/FP 250 mcg b.i.d.) and S+FP (S 50 mcg b.i.d.+FP 250 mcg b.i.d.) for 14 days. sGaw and FEV(1) were determined 0-12h after the first and last doses. RESULTS: Treatment with both SFC and S+FP produced marked bronchodilation, which was maintained 0-12h after the first dose. Baseline sGaw and FEV(1) increased up to 51% and 180 mL, respectively, in Japanese subjects over 2 weeks of treatment, with similar improvements in Caucasian subjects. On Day 14 the 0-12h S+FP:SFC treatment ratios (90% CI) for sGaw AUC and peak were 1.05 (0.98, 1.12) and 1.05 (0.97, 1.14), respectively, in Japanese subjects, and 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) and 0.98 (0.89, 1.07), respectively, in Caucasian subjects, with no difference between the two ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of a similar significant bronchodilator response in Japanese and Caucasian asthmatics following concurrent and combination treatment with salmeterol and FP suggests that the therapeutic response to these agents is comparable and independent of ethnicity in Japanese and Caucasian asthma patients.
Respirology. 2007 Sep; 12(5): 732-9
Lindberg A, Szalai Z, Pullerits T, Radeczky E
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Data on the onset of action of COPD medications are lacking. This study compared the onset of bronchodilation following different inhaled therapies in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and reversible airway obstruction. METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study, 90 patients (aged >or=40 years; FEV(1) 30-70% predicted) were randomized to a single dose (two inhalations) of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, salmeterol/fluticasone 25/250 microg, salbutamol 100 microg or placebo (via pressurized metered-dose inhalers) on four visits. The primary end-point was change in FEV(1) 5 min after drug inhalation; secondary end-points included inspiratory capacity (IC) and perception of onset of effect. RESULTS: Budesonide/formoterol significantly improved FEV(1) at 5 min compared with placebo (P < 0.0001) and salmeterol/fluticasone (P = 0.0001). Significant differences were first observed at 3 min. Onset of effect was similar with budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol. Improvements in FEV(1) following active treatments were superior to placebo after 180 min (all P < 0.0001); both combinations were better than salbutamol at maintaining FEV(1) improvements (P
Clin Ther. 2007 Jul; 29(7): 1390-402
Cowie RL, Boulet LP, Keith PK, Scott-Wilson CA, House KW, Dorinsky PM
BACKGROUND: Many patients with asthma require an inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) in addition to an inhaled corticosteroid to adequately control their disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term tolerability of a salmeterol xinafoate/ fluticasone propionate (SFC) hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler (MDI) at 3 different doses BID. METHODS: This 52-week, open-label, stratified, parallel-group study assessed SFC in patients with persistent asthma. Patients, aged > or = 12 years, with a diagnosis of asthma for > or = 6 months, and a percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) or peak expiratory flow (PEF) between 40% and 90% were enrolled between January 1999 and June 1999. The last patient completed the 12-month study in June 2000. Patients were allowed to continue their current asthma treatment during run-in, with the exception that short-acting beta(2)-agonists (SABAs), LABAs, and oral bronchodilators were not to be used 6, 12, and 24 hours, respectively, prior to the randomization visit. During the open-label randomized treatment period, patients were instructed to discontinue all other asthma medications with the exception of the albuterol MDI to use on an as-needed basis. Patients were assigned to treatment based on their existing asthma regimen: SABA monotherapy or LABA with or without fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 to 1000 microg/d or equivalent with or without LABA (group 3). Patients administered 2 inhalations BID of SFC hydrofluoroalkane at doses of 25/50 microg/actuation (group 1), 25/125 microg/actuation (group 2), or 25/250 pg/actuation (group 3). The primary end point was tolerability as assessed by adverse events (AEs). AEs were determined via diary cards and investigator inquiry at visits. Serious AEs were defined as death, any life-threatening event, hospitalization, disability, congenital anomaly in the patient's offspring, or other important medical events judged by the investigator to be serious. Other outcomes included clinical laboratory tests (hematology, chemistry, electrolytes), 24-hour urinary-free cortisol excretion, 12-lead electrocardiograms, oropharyngeal examinations, vital signs, clinic visit lung function tests (FEV(1) and PEF), daily diary card entries of morning PEF, and rescue medication usage. RESULTS: Of the 372 patients assessed for eligibility, 325 from 22 centers across Canada were enrolled and randomized to treatment. Group 1 consisted of 98 patients (55% women; 86% white; mean age, 37 years; mean [SD] weight, 79 [20] kg). Group 2 consisted of 109 patients (46% women; 94% white; mean age, 44 years; mean [SD] weight, 80 [17] kg). Group 3 consisted of 118 patients (47% women; 90% white; mean age, 45 years; mean [SD] weight, 80 [18] kg). A total of 15 adolescents (aged 12-17 years) comprised 11%, 2%, and 2% of groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Treatments were well tolerated, and 274 (84%) of the 325 patients enrolled completed the study. Upper respiratory tract infection was the most common AE reported: 52%, 37%, and 49% of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Twenty (6%) patients withdrew because of an AE, with worsening asthma being the most frequent reason (n = 9). None of the serious AEs (11 [3 %]) were considered drug related by the investigators. Improvements in FEV(1) and PEF and re- duction in symptomatic albuterol use occurred during the first 4 weeks and were maintained in all groups throughout the 52-week study. CONCLUSIONS: BID doses of SFC hydrofluoroalkane 50/100 pg, 50/250 pg, and 50/500 pg administered via MDI for 52 weeks were well tolerated in this population of adolescents and adults with persistent asthma.
Drug Saf. 2007; 30(8): 681-95
Perrio MJ, Wilton LV, Shakir SA
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring was required for the introduction of non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants in metered dose inhalers (MDIs) to ensure that there were no unexpected adverse events due to the new products. A postmarketing surveillance study has been conducted to evaluate the introduction of the MDI Seretide Evohaler (hydrofluoroalkane-134a inhaler containing salmeterol and fluticasone propionate). OBJECTIVES: To summarise the modified prescription-event monitoring (PEM) study conducted to evaluate the introduction of Seretide Evohaler and discuss the relevance of this type of study towards pharmacovigilance risk-management planning. METHODS: Modified PEM methodology was used to examine the introduction of Seretide Evohaler into general practice in England. Patients were identified from the first National Health Service prescriptions dispensed in England for Seretide Evohaler. One postal questionnaire was sent to the prescribing doctor, requesting demographic information, severity of the indication, concomitant medication for this condition, smoking history, event data 3 months prior to and 3 months after the first prescription for Seretide Evohaler and also reason for stopping if it had been stopped. Pregnancies, deaths and selected events were followed up. Incidence density ratios were calculated to compare event rates 3 months prior to and 3 months after the introduction of Seretide Evohaler. A matched cohort analysis examined oral corticosteroid use and hospital admissions between the pre- and post-exposure periods. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 13,464 patients prescribed Seretide Evohaler, with a response rate of 62%. There was no significant difference in the length of courses of oral corticosteroid use when the pre- and post-exposure periods were compared. A matched cohort analysis showed there was no increase in the use of oral corticosteroids (relative risk [RR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.90, 0.99) or hospital admissions in the post-exposure period (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.73, 1.04). When the number of patients with events were compared for the periods 3 months before and 3 months after exposure, fewer events were reported in the post-exposure period. There were 64 patients who experienced adverse events within an hour of using Seretide Evohaler, including one report of paradoxical bronchospasm and one of myocardial infarction with fatal outcome that were both assessed as possibly related to treatment. DISCUSSION: The results of the study suggest that the introduction of Seretide Evohaler was generally well tolerated. The modified methodology has allowed a comparison of the event rates before and after the introduction of this CFC-free inhaler into general practice.