Latest medical literature on albuterol

Our library of drug research abstracts drawn from the medical literature is updated on a regular schedule, and you can be assured that new albuterol research articles will be listed here shortly after becoming available to us.

Medical research on albuterol

Effect of fluticasone 250 mug/salmeterol 50 mug and montelukast on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatics.

Can Respir J. 2008 May-Jun; 15(4): 193-8
Gelb AF, Taylor CF, Shinar CM, Gutierrez CA, Zamel N
BACKGROUND: Monitoring noninvasive biomarkers of inflammation is an important adjunct in asthma therapy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to identify airway and alveolar site(s) of inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide (NO) as a marker in asthmatic patients, and to evaluate the NO response to maintenance fluticasone 250 mug/salmeterol 50 mug (F/S) and add-on montelukast 10 mg (M). METHODS: Thirty (24 women) nonsmoking, mild to moderate asthmatic patients were studied, mean age (+/- SD) 43+/-9 years, treated with F/S for more than one year. All were clinically stable for longer than eight weeks and had not taken oral corticosteroids and/or leukotriene antagonists for eight weeks before the present study. Spirometry, Juniper asthma symptom score, fractional exhaled NO (FENO) 100 mL/s, bronchial NO and alveolar NO concentration (CANO) were measured in a single-blind, nonrandomized crossover study. Protocol: Visit 1: baseline F/S; visit 2: after four weeks of F/S plus M; visit 3: after four weeks of S plus M; and visit 4: after four weeks of S only. Values in asthmatic patients were also compared with 34 nonsmoking age-matched healthy controls with normal lung function. RESULTS: After 180 mug aerosolized metered dose inhaler albuterol, the forced expiratory volume in 1 s at baseline was 2.6+/-0.8 L (86%+/-16% of the predicted value) and the forced expiratory volume in 1 s over the forced vital capacity was 77%+/-9% (mean +/- SD), and was similar at visits 2 to 4. Juniper scores were mildly abnormal at visits 1 to 3, but significantly worse (P=0.03) at visit 4 versus visits 1 to 3. FENO values at visits 1 to 3 were similar but significantly increased (P=0.007) at visit 4. Bronchial NO was higher (P=0.03) at visit 4, versus visits 1 and 2, and was no different at visit 3. Compared with the healthy subjects, FENO and bronchial NO values were abnormal (greater than the normal mean plus 2 SD) in 33% of asthmatic patients at visits 1 to 3. CANO was similar for visits 1 to 4. CANO was abnormal (greater than the normal mean + 2 SD) in 20% of asthmatic patients. CONCLUSION: In clinically stable asthmatic patients, despite controller treatment including moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroids and add-on M, 33% of mild to moderate asthmatic patients have ongoing nonsuppressed bronchial sites of increased NO production, compared with healthy control subjects. These controllers have no effect on CANO, which was abnormal in 20% of the asthmatic patients studied. The addition of add-on M to baseline moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroid did not further reduce total exhaled, bronchial and/or alveolar NO production.

Temporal Strength Changes From Resistance Exercise and Albuterol on Unloaded Muscle.

J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jun 9;
Caruso JF, Hamill JL, Yamauchi M, Saito K, Cook TD, Mercado DR
Caruso, JF, Hamill, JL, Yamauchi, M, Saito, K, Cook, TD, and Mercado, DR. Temporal strength changes from resistance exercise and albuterol on unloaded muscle. J Strength Cond Res 22, 1156-1163, 2008-To assess unloaded knee extensor temporal strength changes, healthy subjects without asthma performed 40 continuous days of unilateral limb suspension, whereby their left leg refrained from normal weight-bearing and ambulatory activity. During the 40-day period, subjects performed resistance exercise (REX) with their unloaded leg on an inertial resistance ergometer and, as part of a double-blind design, consumed the maximal oral therapeutic dosage of albuterol (i.e., 16 mg.d) or a placebo (i.e., lactose) with no crossover. Workout data were partitioned into 4 10-day periods that ran consecutively. Dependent strength variables included concentric total work, eccentric total work, concentric average power (CAP), and eccentric average power (EAP). Dependent variables were analyzed with 5 (time) x 2 (group) x 2 (gender) mixed factorial analyses of variance and the Tukey honestly significant difference test. Concentric total work, CAP, and EAP each demonstrated a time-group-gender (p < 0.05) interaction. Female REX-placebo subjects had the greatest percentage of unloaded knee extensor strength loss. However, female REX-albuterol subjects fared best throughout the 40-day period and incurred significant unloaded knee extensor strength gains. Differences in strength changes between male and female REX-albuterol subjects was likely due to the higher relative dosage administered to the latter, as body mass showed a gender (i.e., men > women) effect. Future research may elucidate the ideal dose-response relationship for REX-albuterol treatment for use aboard manned space flights and in other disuse models. Coaches and practitioners should carefully examine their sport-governing bodies' rules on albuterol administration and give the drug only if an athlete's health warrants such treatment.

Lung function and symptom improvement with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium bromide/albuterol in COPD: Response by beta-agonist reversibility.

Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008 May 1;
Bleecker ER, Emmett A, Crater G, Knobil K, Kalberg C
This retrospective analysis of data from two multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group studies compared the efficacy of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) 250/50mcg twice daily with ipratropium bromide/albuterol (IB/ALB) 36/206 mcg four times daily in albuterol-reversible (n=320 [44%]) and non-reversible (n=399 [56%]) patients with COPD. In reversible and non-reversible patients, both treatments significantly increased FEV(1)AUC(0-6h) from baseline and the magnitude of improvement was larger in reversible patients. FSC increased FEV(1)AUC(0-6h) by 1.46+/-0.08 and 1.98+/-0.13 l-h at Day 1 and Week 8, respectively, in reversible patients, compared with 0.71+/-0.06 and 0.94+/-0.10 l-h in non-reversible patients (p

Albuterol vs. levalbuterol for asthma treatment in children.

Am Fam Physician. 2008 May 1; 77(9): 1214-6
Dachs R, Darby-Stewart A, Graber MA

When off-label is a good practice: the example of paracetamol and salbutamol.

Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jun; 93(6): 546-7
Bua J, L'Erario I, Barbi E, Marchetti F

Effect of an Inhaled Glucocorticoid on Endothelial Function in Healthy Smokers.

J Appl Physiol. 2008 May 8;
Mendes ES, Horvath G, Rebolledo P, Monzon ME, Casalino-Matsuda SM, Wanner A
Cigarette smoking is associated with attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilation (endothelial dysfunction) in the systemic circulation including the airway circulation. We wished to determine if an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) could restore endothelial function in the airway of lung-healthy current smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers. We measured baseline airway blood flow (Qaw) and Qaw reactivity to inhaled albuterol as an index of endothelium-dependent vasodilation and to sublingual nitroglycerin as an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation in lung-healthy current smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers. Current smokers were then treated with inhaled fluticasone for 3 weeks, and all measurements were repeated after fluticasone treatment and after a subsequent 3-week fluticasone washout period. Baseline mean Qaw and endothelium-independent Qaw reactivity were similar in the three groups. Mean endothelium-dependent Qaw reactivity was 49.5% in non-smokers, 42.7% in ex-smokers, and 10.8% in current smokers (p

Pharmacogenetic response to albuterol among asthmatics.

Pharmacogenomics. 2008 May; 9(5): 505-10
Corvol H, Burchard EG
Pharmacogenetics offers to individualize asthma treatment by identifying genetic variants associated with drug efficacy or adverse events. Several studies have focused on pharmacogenetic associations with albuterol, the most commonly prescribed medication for asthma worldwide. However, pharmacogenetic associations have varied within and between studies and across populations. Herein, we focus on pharmacogenetic associations between genetic variants in the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor gene and bronchodilator response to albuterol among subjects with asthma.

Asthma exacerbations in African Americans treated for 1 year with combination fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jun; 24(6): 1669-82
Bailey W, Castro M, Matz J, White M, Dransfield M, Yancey S, Ortega H
OBJECTIVE: This long-term prospective study was conducted in African Americans with persistent asthma to examine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), and the long-acting beta-agonist, salmeterol, compared with FP alone. RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center trial in adolescent and adult subjects >/=12 years of age symptomatic on a low dose of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The study consisted of a 2-week screening period on low dose ICS; a 4-week open-label FP 250 mcg twice daily (BID) run-in; a 52-week double-blind period (FP/salmeterol [FSC] 100/50 mcg [n=239] or FP 100 mcg [n=236] BID), and a 4-week FP 250 mcg BID run-out period. Annualized exacerbation rate was the primary outcome for comparing the two treatments. Other measures of asthma control included peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, and albuterol use. Safety was assessed through adverse events. RESULTS: Exacerbation rates were not significantly different in those treated with FSC 100/50 mcg (0.449 per year) compared with FP 100 mcg (0.529 per year, p=0.169). When the per-protocol analysis was applied, the rates were 0.465 and 0.769 per year for FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg, respectively. Treatment with FSC 100/50 mcg provided statistically greater improvements in lung function measures and nighttime awakenings (p

Early bronchodilatory effects of budesonide/formoterol pMDI compared with fluticasone/salmeterol DPI and albuterol pMDI: 2 randomized controlled trials in adults with persistent asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

J Asthma. 2008 May; 45(4): 265-72
Hampel FC, Martin P, Mezzanotte WS
Two identically designed, randomized, multicenter, single-dose, crossover studies were conducted in patients aged > or = 18 years with mild to moderate asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids. After 2 weeks on twice-daily budesonide pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) 160 microg, patients received a randomized sequence of budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 microg x 2 inhalations (160/9 microg), fluticasone/salmeterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) 250/50 microg x 1 inhalation, albuterol pMDI 90 microg x 2 inhalations (180 microg), and placebo pMDI (3-to 14-day washout periods). Improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) at 3 minutes were significantly (p < 0.001) greater after treatment with budesonide/formoterol pMDI compared with fluticasone/salmeterol DPI and similar to that of albuterol pMDI. In addition, significantly (p < 0.001) more patients treated with budesonide/formoterol pMDI achieved a 15% improvement in FEV(1) within 15 minutes compared with patients treated with fluticasone/salmeterol DPI and placebo. Thus, the early bronchodilatory effects of budesonide/formoterol pMDI were greater than with fluticasone/salmeterol DPI.

Montelukast as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma: a systematic review.

Thorax. 2008 May; 63(5): 453-62
Joos S, Miksch A, Szecsenyi J, Wieseler B, Grouven U, Kaiser T, Schneider A
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for the medium to long term benefits and risks of montelukast as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in comparison with placebo and active controls in mild to moderate asthma. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, reference lists of retrieved articles, clinical trial registries and study results databases. REVIEW METHODS: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (duration > or = 12 weeks) in adolescents and adults comparing montelukast/ICS versus ICS monotherapy or montelukast/ICS versus active control/ICS. Meta-analyses were conducted where feasible. The main focus was on clinical outcomes (eg, exacerbations). Adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: 13 studies meeting all of the inclusion criteria were identified: 7 studies, including constant or tapered doses of ICS, compared montelukast/ICS with ICS monotherapy. Six studies compared add-on montelukast with an add-on active control (salmeterol). Overall, the data indicated that montelukast/ICS was clinically more effective than ICS monotherapy. The ICS sparing potential of montelukast was clearly demonstrated in one study. Montelukast/ICS and ICS monotherapy showed similar safety profiles. In the active controlled studies, montelukast/ICS was clinically less effective than salmeterol/ICS in the 12 week trials (pooled proportion of patients with > or = 1 exacerbation: p = 0.006). However, separate analysis of active controlled 48 week trials showed comparable proportions for patients with > or = 1 exacerbation in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast as add-on therapy to ICS improves control of mild to moderate asthma compared with ICS monotherapy. Although the addition of salmeterol to ICS is clinically as effective as or even more effective than the addition of montelukast, montelukast may have a better long term safety profile and offer a treatment alternative for asthma patients.